2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/8213056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Diagnosis of Variable Load Bearing Based on Quantum Chaotic Fruit Fly VMD and Variational RVM

Abstract: Under normal circumstances, bearings generally run under variable loading conditions. Under such conditions, the vibration signals of the bearing malfunctions are often nonstationary signals, which are difficult to process effectively. In order to accurately and effectively diagnose the failure types and damage degree of bearings under variable load conditions, an intelligent diagnostic model based on the variational mode decomposition (VMD) of quantum chaotic fruit fly optimization algorithm (QCFOA) and a mul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the effectiveness of the methodology proposed in this study for diagnosing bearing faults using vibration and electrical signals, a comparative analysis was undertaken against existing fault diagnosis approaches designed for variable working conditions. Our method was specifically benchmarked against several state-of-the-art techniques, including the STFT-CNN method presented in [59], the DFSM method outlined in [60], the CEEMDAN-SSA-RVM method detailed in [61], the TL-CNN method from [62], the KNN method featured in [63], and the V-RVM method described in [64]. Table 7 displays the comparative results, indicating that the proposed method attains accuracies of 99.40% and 98.30% when utilizing vibration and electrical signals.…”
Section: Comparing With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the effectiveness of the methodology proposed in this study for diagnosing bearing faults using vibration and electrical signals, a comparative analysis was undertaken against existing fault diagnosis approaches designed for variable working conditions. Our method was specifically benchmarked against several state-of-the-art techniques, including the STFT-CNN method presented in [59], the DFSM method outlined in [60], the CEEMDAN-SSA-RVM method detailed in [61], the TL-CNN method from [62], the KNN method featured in [63], and the V-RVM method described in [64]. Table 7 displays the comparative results, indicating that the proposed method attains accuracies of 99.40% and 98.30% when utilizing vibration and electrical signals.…”
Section: Comparing With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments of the VMD method mainly concentrate on the field of fault diagnosis. With the assistance of the particle swarm optimization [14][15][16], multikernel support vector machine [17], the k-nearest neighbour algorithm [18], and other novel algorithms [19][20][21], promising results have been obtained. In a similar manner with the EMD denoising, the VMD has also been introduced to signal denoising based on the detrended fluctuation analysis [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%