Volume 1: Operations and Maintenance, Aging Management and Plant Upgrades; Nuclear Fuel, Fuel Cycle, Reactor Physics and Transp 2016
DOI: 10.1115/icone24-60334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Diagnosis of Feedwater Pump in Nuclear Power Plants Using Parameter-Optimized Support Vector Machine

Abstract: The condition monitoring of the feedwater pump in secondary circuit is critical to the safe operation of the nuclear power plant. This article presents a fault diagnosis method of feedwater pump by using parameter-optimized support vector machine (SVM). While the fault features of feedwater pump are reflected from the power spectrum of the vibration signals, we trained and diagnosed the fault feature table with support vector machine. The optimal penalty factor C and kernel parameter γ of support vector machin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sixty-seven sets of signals were generated, of which forty sets were used to train the model and twenty-seven sets were used to test the accuracy of the model. Feature extraction was performed for seven different signals, and classification was performed using six algorithms-ELM [26], SVM [27], KNN [28], NB [29], NN [30], and DTA [31]-and the recognition rate of the classification results is shown in Figure 8, from which we can see that the accuracy of classification recognition using the ELM algorithm was 92.86%, which was able to identify 100% of bias, blocking, drift, period, and internal fault signals, respectively. The accuracy of classification recognition using the SVM algorithm was the same as that of ELM algorithm; the accuracy of classification recognition using the KNN algorithm was 89.29%, whereby it was able to identify 100% of bias, blocking, drift, period and internal fault signals, 50% of normal signals and 75% of multiplicative signals.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixty-seven sets of signals were generated, of which forty sets were used to train the model and twenty-seven sets were used to test the accuracy of the model. Feature extraction was performed for seven different signals, and classification was performed using six algorithms-ELM [26], SVM [27], KNN [28], NB [29], NN [30], and DTA [31]-and the recognition rate of the classification results is shown in Figure 8, from which we can see that the accuracy of classification recognition using the ELM algorithm was 92.86%, which was able to identify 100% of bias, blocking, drift, period, and internal fault signals, respectively. The accuracy of classification recognition using the SVM algorithm was the same as that of ELM algorithm; the accuracy of classification recognition using the KNN algorithm was 89.29%, whereby it was able to identify 100% of bias, blocking, drift, period and internal fault signals, 50% of normal signals and 75% of multiplicative signals.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bearing failures, cavitation, unbalance, misalignment, etc. The literature contains many examples of proposals for RUL prediction of components applied to centrifugal pumps, some of which can be found in [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. On the other hand, Li X. et al in [19] analyse the prognosis techniques of rotating equipment using system-level models, the purpose in this case is the prediction of the RUL at a system level.…”
Section: Fig 1 Diagnosis Y Prognosis Approaches [3]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SVM technique has been used for classification data sets in recent years and has been proven to have achieved satisfactory results in various studies. [45][46][47] First, the SVM algorithm was invented by Vapnik and Learner in 1963 for pattern recognition. 48 Subsequently, the widespread use of this classification technique by ML engineers increased with the increase in the speed of computer technologies since the 2000s.…”
Section: Machine Learning Techniques For Aircraft Hydraulic System Fa...mentioning
confidence: 99%