2024
DOI: 10.1109/access.2024.3357113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Diagnosis Method for Bearing Based on Attention Mechanism and Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Network

Qimin Shen,
Zengqiang Zhang

Abstract: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) serve as powerful feature extraction tools capable of effectively extracting information from complex environments, thus improving the accuracy of fault identification for bearing data. In this paper, we present a method for diagnosing bearing faults using an attention mechanism and a multi-scale convolutional neural network (MSCNN). Firstly, truncate and sample the rolling bearing data, and use continuous wavelet transform to generate corresponding time-frequency images, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To better demonstrate the outstanding advantages of this paper's model in the realm of fault diagnosis under varying operating conditions, we conducted a comprehensive comparison with several network models that classify image and fault diagnosis fields, such as CBAM-ResNet [26], MCAMDN [27], MSCNN [28], MANANR [29], and TLResNet34 [30]. These models exhibit less than 90% accuracy on A-C and C-A when subjected to fault diagnosis under variable working conditions.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better demonstrate the outstanding advantages of this paper's model in the realm of fault diagnosis under varying operating conditions, we conducted a comprehensive comparison with several network models that classify image and fault diagnosis fields, such as CBAM-ResNet [26], MCAMDN [27], MSCNN [28], MANANR [29], and TLResNet34 [30]. These models exhibit less than 90% accuracy on A-C and C-A when subjected to fault diagnosis under variable working conditions.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%