IECON 2014 - 40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2014.7049174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault diagnosis in non-isolated bidirectional half-bridge DC-DC converters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the effectiveness of most FD schemes has been studied under CCM due to ease of implementation. Without using extra sensor, the authors have used I L , output voltage V OUT and input voltage V IN to detect switch OCF regardless of the operating mode for all types of unidirectional non isolated DC-DC converters [23] and bidirectional half-bridge DC-DC converters [24]. A block diagram of the FD method in [23] for Buck converter is given in Figure 11.…”
Section: ) Limit Checking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effectiveness of most FD schemes has been studied under CCM due to ease of implementation. Without using extra sensor, the authors have used I L , output voltage V OUT and input voltage V IN to detect switch OCF regardless of the operating mode for all types of unidirectional non isolated DC-DC converters [23] and bidirectional half-bridge DC-DC converters [24]. A block diagram of the FD method in [23] for Buck converter is given in Figure 11.…”
Section: ) Limit Checking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the help of gating signals information, several approaches are developed based on sampling the magnitude of inductor current at falling and rising edges. Minute changes in the fault diagnostic algorithms were made and it was successfully implemented in non‐isolated bidirectional DC–DC converters [46], multi‐input DC–DC converters [47], interleaved DC–DC converters [48], and in non‐isolated unidirectional DC–DC converters [49]. The logical relationship between the current magnitude measured at falling and rising edges of gating signals are concerned by OCFs in converter switches as depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Fault Diagnostic Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative approaches, based on the same diagnostic variable, take advantage of the gating signals information to sample the amplitude of the inductor current at the rising and falling edges. Variations of the fault diagnostic algorithm were successfully employed in a multi-input DC-DC converter [14] , non-isolated bidirectional DC-DC converter [15] , non-isolated unidirectional DC-DC converter [16] , and in an interleaved DC-DC boost converter [17] . As confirmed in Fig.…”
Section: Time Domain Signal Processing Based Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, the logical relations between the current amplitude measured at the rising and falling edges of the gating signals are affected by OC faults in the converter switches. Indeed, it is a behaviour observed in all aforementioned converter topologies [14][15][16][17]. Current amplitude also provides sufficient information for diagnostic of faults in parallel-connected single active bridge(SAB) DC-DC converters [18] .…”
Section: Time Domain Signal Processing Based Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%