2019
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.23491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault diagnosis in industrial chemical processes using optimal probabilistic neural network

Abstract: For fault detection and diagnosis in large‐scale industrial systems, traditional methods have a low classification accuracy, which is an issue. This paper proposes a fault diagnosis method based on the modified cuckoo search algorithm (MCS) to optimize the probabilistic neural network (PNN). The random forest treebagger (RFtb) is used to reduce the data feature and the PNN is trained for fault diagnosis and classification. However, in order to address the problem that the parameters of PNN easily fall into the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters of the neural network are not designed by human engineers but are learned from the data, which makes it better for nonlinear process monitoring . Recently, deep learning has gained more attention from the field of process monitoring than ever before, especially the stacked denoising auto‐encoder (SDAE) . Zhang et al proposed a process monitoring algorithm based on SDAE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The parameters of the neural network are not designed by human engineers but are learned from the data, which makes it better for nonlinear process monitoring . Recently, deep learning has gained more attention from the field of process monitoring than ever before, especially the stacked denoising auto‐encoder (SDAE) . Zhang et al proposed a process monitoring algorithm based on SDAE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20,21] Recently, deep learning has gained more attention from the field of process monitoring than ever before, especially the stacked denoising auto-encoder (SDAE). [22][23][24][25] Zhang et al [25] proposed a process monitoring algorithm based on SDAE. First, SDAE is utilized to model the nonlinear relationship by encoding the collected data into latent variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to verify the performance of the proposed model in fault diagnosis, first we use genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, and MBA algorithm to optimize PNN for diagnosis. In addition, we input normal training samples and fault training samples corresponding to various fault characteristics into the MBA‐PNN model and some common diagnostic models, such as support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), K nearest neighbour (KNN), naive Bayes (NB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) . In terms of the parameters of the optimization model, the number of iterations is 50 and the optimal number of algorithms in the GA‐PNN, PSO‐PNN, and MBA‐PNN models is 20.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we input normal training samples and fault training samples corresponding to various fault characteristics into the MBA-PNN model and some common diagnostic models, such as support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), K nearest neighbour (KNN), naive Bayes (NB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] In terms of the parameters of the optimization model, the number of iterations is 50 and the optimal number of algorithms in the GA-PNN, PSO-PNN, and MBA-PNN models is 20. According to the Lin et al [36] the MBA algorithm sets frequency value ω to 0.25, α to .2, and γ to 0.9.…”
Section: Comparison Of Diagnosis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter smoothing factor (σ) in the network was optimized by the modified cuckoo search algorithm, which makes the network have a better classification effect. The experimental results compared the accuracy and F 1 ‐score of different fault diagnosis models to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the proposed model …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%