2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2018.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault diagnosis for distillation process based on CNN–DAE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing fault identification methods are mainly divided into: Qualitative methods [2], quantitative methods [3,4], and data-driven methods [5,6]. Among all of the data-driven fault identification methods, the supervised machine learning technique provides impressive fault identification results for the chemical process [7,8].…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The existing fault identification methods are mainly divided into: Qualitative methods [2], quantitative methods [3,4], and data-driven methods [5,6]. Among all of the data-driven fault identification methods, the supervised machine learning technique provides impressive fault identification results for the chemical process [7,8].…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) The labeled data and unlabeled data in M are used to train DAS4VM. (5) The PCA-DAS4VM model will be built if the pseudo label confidence is higher than 80%.…”
Section: Fault Identification Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This learning task is similar to the training in natural language processing (NLP) and image recognition [20]. That is why a DAE-CNN ( Figure 2) was specifically designed as the subnetwork to process the harmonic features, and output a vector [21][22][23]. The output vector, together with the environmental conditions, was received by the fullyconnected network, which then output the predicted changes of measuring errors.…”
Section: Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works with real cases containing fault detection and diagnosis implementation were presented in [30][31][32]. Furthermore, some representative simulated cases were presented in [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%