2010
DOI: 10.3182/20100705-3-be-2011.00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault detection using CUSUM based techniques with application to the Tennessee Eastman Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of these methods has shown different levels of success in detecting and diagnosing the faults considered in the simulations (Table 1). Several statistical studies have reported faults 3, 9 and 15 as unobservable or difficult to diagnose due to the close similarity in the responses of the noisy measurements used to detect these faults [24,35,9,11] and therefore these 3 faults were not considered in the current study. 3 and 4 respectively.…”
Section: Case Study: Tennessee Eastman Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these methods has shown different levels of success in detecting and diagnosing the faults considered in the simulations (Table 1). Several statistical studies have reported faults 3, 9 and 15 as unobservable or difficult to diagnose due to the close similarity in the responses of the noisy measurements used to detect these faults [24,35,9,11] and therefore these 3 faults were not considered in the current study. 3 and 4 respectively.…”
Section: Case Study: Tennessee Eastman Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these methods has shown different levels of success in detecting and diagnosing the 20 faults considered in the simulations (Table 1). Several statistical studies have reported faults 3, 9 and 15 as unobservable or difficult to diagnose due to the close similarity in the responses of the noisy measurements used to detect these faults [31,43,10,15]. These 3 difficult to observe faults are referred hereafter as incipient faults.…”
Section: Review Of Fdd Techniques Relevant To the Tennessee Eastman P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another variant of the PCA approach that combines the results from the PCA algorithm with a Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) operation has shown to be a viable option to solve the detection problem of the incipient faults but a relative long time after occurrence of the fault is needed for detection. The reason is that the cumulative sum of PCA score values over a sufficient amount of time can provide detection of minor changes in the process variables that cannot be detected without using the CUSUM operation [43,44].…”
Section: Review Of Fdd Techniques Relevant To the Tennessee Eastman P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study by the authors of the current paper has proposed the application of cumulative−sum (CUSUM) based models for the detection of faults in the Tennessee Eastman problem (TEP) . Bin Shams et al proposed the application of location CUSUM (LCS) and scale CUSUM (SCS) based models to detect three particular faults that have been found unobservable by other algorithms previously applied to the TEP. , After demonstrating the detection capability of the univariate CUSUM-based methods for each one of the three faults, a Hotelling’s T 2 chart based on a cumulative sum of the observations was proposed for the individual or simultaneous detection of these three faults. The latter was found to be essential when large numbers of correlated variables are considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%