2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2005.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault detection properties of global, local and time evolving models for batch process monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Local models [20] are the simplest example of this approach, where the submodel associated to a sampling time is computed from the data collected at that sampling time alone. Data are split according to Equation (7).…”
Section: K-models Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Local models [20] are the simplest example of this approach, where the submodel associated to a sampling time is computed from the data collected at that sampling time alone. Data are split according to Equation (7).…”
Section: K-models Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the inclusion of the dynamics of the process can be crucial for a good modelling performance. A straightforward alternative to local modelling is evolving modelling [20], where all the possible LMVs are included in a sub-model as additional variables (8).…”
Section: K-models Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, the use of a single model in an on-line application, for instance in a monitoring system, presents some drawbacks [7,8]. An alternative way to model a batch process is to fit a bilinear model for every single sampling time of the process [9][10][11]. This is referred here as the K-model approach, which principal drawback is the large number of models to deal with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%