The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1109/tec.2021.3062049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Detection, Classification and Localization Algorithm for Photovoltaic Array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, most of the previous research has been done based on theorical assumptions [2], on data generated by simulation [3,4], or on limited recorded data from laboratory tests [5]. Moreover, in most of these studies, only electrical faults such as line to line (LL), line to ground (LG), and open circuit (OC) were considered for detection [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Non-electrical faults such as glass breakage were not considered and only a limited number of studies were undertaken to detect some of the physical faults such as connector faults [3,11] or potential induced degradation (PID) faults [4,7,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, most of the previous research has been done based on theorical assumptions [2], on data generated by simulation [3,4], or on limited recorded data from laboratory tests [5]. Moreover, in most of these studies, only electrical faults such as line to line (LL), line to ground (LG), and open circuit (OC) were considered for detection [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Non-electrical faults such as glass breakage were not considered and only a limited number of studies were undertaken to detect some of the physical faults such as connector faults [3,11] or potential induced degradation (PID) faults [4,7,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15]. However, these methods demand a large number of auxiliary equipment and require a complex platform to detect the faults, resulting in a cost‐inefficient system [16]. A sensor‐less approach for the detection of L–L/L–G faults is done by Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To name a few, Satpathy and Sharma [6] studied the sensitivity of PVA topology to local coloring and electrical faults using various electrical parameters based on Matlab/Simulink environment and verified by experimental analysis. Mehmood et al [7] used switches to reconfigure electrical wiring under different shadow profiles, focusing on improving the performance and efficiency of traditional static photovoltaic systems (PVSs). They adopted a metaheuristic algorithm (MHA) and firefly algorithm (FFA) to control the switching mode under nonuniform shadow profile and tracked the highest global peak of multiple switching mode-generated power coefficient (PC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%