2015
DOI: 10.3390/sym7041734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Detection Based on Multi-Scale Local Binary Patterns Operator and Improved Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization Algorithm

Abstract: Aiming to effectively recognize train center plate bolt loss faults, this paper presents an improved fault detection method. A multi-scale local binary pattern operator containing the local texture information of different radii is designed to extract more efficient discrimination information. An improved teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm is established to optimize the classification results in the decision level. Two new phases including the worst recombination phase and the cuckoo search phase a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the BRD values obtained in the Rec37, 39, 41 problem sets were not optimal, the algorithm still showed a better performance. It can also be seen that the average BRD of the MSDTLBO was significantly better than that of the other 30,2,36,24,42,31,27,40,41,4,35,6,10,25,20,7,12,47,19,48,15,14,44,13,18,23,39,26,17,43,1,21,33,38,37,8,28,45,32,49,9,0,5,29,11,34,3,16 comparison algorithms, except for HMM-FPA. Compared to the ARD, the MSDTLBO algorithm did not obtain optimal values on the Rec37 and 39 problem sets, while for the rest of the problem sets, its average ARD value was better than that of the other algorithms.…”
Section: Algorithm Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the BRD values obtained in the Rec37, 39, 41 problem sets were not optimal, the algorithm still showed a better performance. It can also be seen that the average BRD of the MSDTLBO was significantly better than that of the other 30,2,36,24,42,31,27,40,41,4,35,6,10,25,20,7,12,47,19,48,15,14,44,13,18,23,39,26,17,43,1,21,33,38,37,8,28,45,32,49,9,0,5,29,11,34,3,16 comparison algorithms, except for HMM-FPA. Compared to the ARD, the MSDTLBO algorithm did not obtain optimal values on the Rec37 and 39 problem sets, while for the rest of the problem sets, its average ARD value was better than that of the other algorithms.…”
Section: Algorithm Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…in various optimization problems. For example, Zhang et al [16] presented a more effective approach to detecting faults. They implemented an enhanced teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm to refine the classification outcomes at the decision level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,31 The LBP dictates the pixel-level binary patterns of the fastener at a local level. 32,33 As shown in Figure 4, it is straightforward to construct these descriptors based on the outlook of the fasteners from the image captured with ample illumination. These descriptors are then further fed into the training pipeline, e.g.…”
Section: System Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, for TFDS, fault recognition is accomplished automatically by computers or man-machines, which greatly enhances the efficiency and reliability of fault detection [5]. Generally, the main fault types include Center-Plate-Bolt losing, Safety Chain dropping, Brake-Shoe-Key losing, Side-Frame-Key losing and so on [5,6,7,8]. In these failures, the most common failure is Side-Frame-Key(SFK) losing fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%