1995
DOI: 10.1109/9.376097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault detection and isolation for unstable linear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be done by considering X as a stochastic variable and using marginalization. (Kinnaert et al, 1995 T r t = T w T H f = Ri. (11.8) This design assumes stationarity in the fault.…”
Section: A2 Unknown Noise Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be done by considering X as a stochastic variable and using marginalization. (Kinnaert et al, 1995 T r t = T w T H f = Ri. (11.8) This design assumes stationarity in the fault.…”
Section: A2 Unknown Noise Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One will also encounter the similar problem when to reconfigure a control system with sensor and/or actuator failures, because there aren't any reconfiguration conditions in some control systems (i.e. one can not tolerate these failures by reconfiguring the control law) [8] .…”
Section: Redundancy Analysis For Actuatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requirement implies the assumption that the signals arising from the plant are bounded, that is, the plant is stable or operating under a stabilizing controller. Note that the residual generator is not expected to compensate for plant instability (Kinnaert et al 1995).…”
Section: Residual Generator Designmentioning
confidence: 99%