2019 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCIS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccisci.2019.8716442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault classification for Photovoltaic Modules Using Thermography and Machine Learning Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The AC faults include gating and switching failures, open and short circuit switches [4], and filter failure-inducing harmonics in the circuits. Whereas DC faults include various module-based faults [5], failure of maximum power-point tracking (MPPT) algorithms, and faults associated with DC-DC converters [6,7]. Also, MPPT systems are responsible for injecting maximum power into the circuit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AC faults include gating and switching failures, open and short circuit switches [4], and filter failure-inducing harmonics in the circuits. Whereas DC faults include various module-based faults [5], failure of maximum power-point tracking (MPPT) algorithms, and faults associated with DC-DC converters [6,7]. Also, MPPT systems are responsible for injecting maximum power into the circuit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to perform fault classification, which has been receiving increasing attention and popularity in recent literature [9], is the use of artificial intelligence models, especially machine learning classifiers, which is also the main approach that is proposed in this work. In [10], for instance, the use of artificial neural networks to classify the operation of a photovoltaic system in four possible states (normal, degradation, short-circuit, and shadowing) is presented.…”
Section: Fault Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to achieve that is to include a MS in the PV plant that measures electrical and meteorological variables, manages plant operations (e.g., remote access), detects malfunctions and errors, and reports performance and benchmarking, locally or remotely, through a communication system to the grid operator [ 6 , 7 ]. However, only the MS is not enough to completely solve the problem [ 8 ], since PV faults demand specific techniques to detect and classify them, using monitored data [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PV faults are categorized into two different PV configurations, including SP and TCT, through neural networks with high accuracy of 99.6%, which is not achieved in the previous research works. Thermal imaging for feature extraction is used in [17] with NN as a classifier for fault detection in PV modules, which achieved 92.8 % overall accuracy as a fault classifier. A comparison of NN classifier with conventional classifiers like K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and support vector machine (SVM) is also made in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal imaging for feature extraction is used in [17] with NN as a classifier for fault detection in PV modules, which achieved 92.8 % overall accuracy as a fault classifier. A comparison of NN classifier with conventional classifiers like K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and support vector machine (SVM) is also made in [17]. Classifiers like SVM and KNN achieved an accuracy of 80.3% and 56.8% respectively, while NN classifier performed better as a fault classifier and achieved an overall accuracy of 92.8% in classification of faults in the PV module.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%