2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatty acids in forages: A comparison of different pre-treatments prior to analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In keeping with previous observations by Arvidsson 318 K. Arvidsson et al et al (2009), the variation was more pronounced during summer growth (Table I). This could be due to variation in the physiological status of individual plants.…”
Section: Seasonal Variationsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In keeping with previous observations by Arvidsson 318 K. Arvidsson et al et al (2009), the variation was more pronounced during summer growth (Table I). This could be due to variation in the physiological status of individual plants.…”
Section: Seasonal Variationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These contrasting results could be due to differences in the plant materials studied and their degree of maturation. Arvidsson et al (2009) compared different handling methods and did not find any substantial differences between, for example, drying in an air forced oven, freezing at (208C, or freeze drying, which indicates that differences in sample preparation should not contribute significantly to any differences between studies in terms of measured FA composition.…”
Section: Seasonal Variationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Rapid freezing with dry ice or liquid N 2 followed by storage at −20°C in an inert (N 2 ) atmosphere has been considered to be the best method to preserve plant tissues (Christie, ). However, comparison of various techniques showed limited effects on fatty acid proportions, and drying of samples has been shown to be an adequate method for preparing samples for fatty acid analysis in samples collected in diverse experiments, both field and feeding experiments, which were not specially designed to investigate fatty acid concentrations (Arvidsson et al ., ). Five grams of the dried sample were used for total fat extraction and fatty acid analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ground samples were then stored in a dry, dark area until transported to the Nutritional Ecology Laboratory at Hunter College, New York, USA and stored in a dry, dark area until assayed [Rothman et al, ]. In addition, because unsaturated fatty acids are susceptible to oxidation [Czerkawski, ; Molloy et al, ; but see: Arvidsson et al, ], on January 23, 2013, 1–3 g of each food species was recollected in BINP and were immediately placed in liquid nitrogen in 5 ml cryotubes for fatty acid analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%