2014
DOI: 10.1590/1982-0216201411512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatores que interferem no desempenho de usuários de implante coclear em testes de percepção de fala

Abstract: Objetivo : analisar os fatores que interferem no desempenho de usuários de implante coclear em testes de percepção de fala.Métodos : foram aplicados questionários e testes de percepção de fala em 25 indivíduos, de ambos os sexos, portadores de perda auditiva neurossensorial e usuários de IC unilateral.Resultados : - 48% dos participantes atingiram bom desempenho nos resultados dos testes de percepção de fala, apresentando porcentagens maiores ou iguais a 50 % de acertos. - Os participantes que obtiveram melhor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the time of CI use ranged from one to nine years (mean of 4.6 years). As in the studies by Santos et al (9) , Buarque et al (18) , Martins et al (17) , Meneses et al (24) , Calvino et al (12) , and Wong et al (21) , there was no statistically significant difference for the longer time of CI use in this study -except for the SRQ tests, in which the participants with the longest time of use had a better performance. It can be stated that only the SRQ had significance because the test was easier, presented in an audible sound pressure level, compatible with the audiometry, in a sound booth without any background noise -i.e., a condition ideal for conversation, easier for comprehension.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In this study, the time of CI use ranged from one to nine years (mean of 4.6 years). As in the studies by Santos et al (9) , Buarque et al (18) , Martins et al (17) , Meneses et al (24) , Calvino et al (12) , and Wong et al (21) , there was no statistically significant difference for the longer time of CI use in this study -except for the SRQ tests, in which the participants with the longest time of use had a better performance. It can be stated that only the SRQ had significance because the test was easier, presented in an audible sound pressure level, compatible with the audiometry, in a sound booth without any background noise -i.e., a condition ideal for conversation, easier for comprehension.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Thus, it is necessary to periodically monitor children with CIs not only to make adjustments related to the programming of the electronic device, but also to check the development and rhythm of the development of auditory and linguistic abilities. To evaluate the ability of auditory speech perception in silence, there are different procedures, including the Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure (GASP) (18,19) , which has been shown to be an effective evaluation instrument for assessing the auditory performance of children with hearing loss (3,(20)(21)(22) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%