2018
DOI: 10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2017.nesp1.57887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fator de difusão: uma medida da difusão do conhecimento através das citações

Abstract: the larger its diffusion is. Identifies 3,158 documents citing IBGE's scientific output. Out of 1,272 institutions which citing authors are affiliated with, 748 (58.80%) are Brazilian institutions or based in Brazil, while 518 (40.72%) are from other countries. Institutions focused on education lead (47.96%) the amount, followed by R&D (22.88%), and the rest (29.16%) is lying on public sectors. A number of 6,168 (81.3%) from 7,587 citation occurrences happens to be of authors with affiliations with Brazilian i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of that involves mathematics. In this case, the methodology for expressing the birth of science is offer: As the order in which the terms appear (if there are in various means such as dictionaries); Study programs (academic facilities for organizing it); Scientific meetings or journals (as a means of accumulation and dissemination) or also the number of documents (as an evidence of growth) (Ben-David & Loewy, 2000;Gupta, 1997;Green, Johnson, & Neal, 2003;Lin & Liao, 2008;Zanotto, Vanz, & Stumpf, 2017;Nasution, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of that involves mathematics. In this case, the methodology for expressing the birth of science is offer: As the order in which the terms appear (if there are in various means such as dictionaries); Study programs (academic facilities for organizing it); Scientific meetings or journals (as a means of accumulation and dissemination) or also the number of documents (as an evidence of growth) (Ben-David & Loewy, 2000;Gupta, 1997;Green, Johnson, & Neal, 2003;Lin & Liao, 2008;Zanotto, Vanz, & Stumpf, 2017;Nasution, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%