2016
DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue strength assessment of laser stake‐welded T‐joints subjected to reversed bending

Abstract: The paper investigates the fatigue strength of laser stake‐welded T‐joints subjected to reversed bending. The fatigue tests are carried out with the load ratio, R ≈ −0.8. The experimental data is firstly analysed using the nominal stress approach and then by the J‐integral as the local fatigue strength parameter in the finite element (FE) assessment. The nominal stress approach demonstrated that the fatigue strength of the investigated T‐joints is lower than encountered for any other steel joint under reversed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the diversity of fatigue failure modes, it is crucial to determine the dominant failure mode for fatigue life prediction. 8 Owing to the complexity of the bridge deck structure, it is difficult to accurately calculate the nominal stress at the fatigue failure location based on classical mechanics methods 9 ; similarly, owing to the characteristic of the evaluation method, the hot spot stress method can only be applied to the issues that fatigue cracks originate from the weld toe 10 ; comparatively, the structural stress method, which is based on the mechanic's principle of the free body cut, could evaluate the fatigue performance of complex structures in the case of both toe failure and root failure. 11 Yang et al 12 analyzed the fatigue behavior of welded joints in OSBD through the above-mentioned evaluation methods; the traction structural stress with 95% confidence intervals is more accurate than those calculated by the other S-N curves based on nominal, hotspot, and effective notch stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the diversity of fatigue failure modes, it is crucial to determine the dominant failure mode for fatigue life prediction. 8 Owing to the complexity of the bridge deck structure, it is difficult to accurately calculate the nominal stress at the fatigue failure location based on classical mechanics methods 9 ; similarly, owing to the characteristic of the evaluation method, the hot spot stress method can only be applied to the issues that fatigue cracks originate from the weld toe 10 ; comparatively, the structural stress method, which is based on the mechanic's principle of the free body cut, could evaluate the fatigue performance of complex structures in the case of both toe failure and root failure. 11 Yang et al 12 analyzed the fatigue behavior of welded joints in OSBD through the above-mentioned evaluation methods; the traction structural stress with 95% confidence intervals is more accurate than those calculated by the other S-N curves based on nominal, hotspot, and effective notch stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present state of the art in this area has not permitted development of a comprehensive calculation method for structures of this type. The calculated fatigue life of the analysed structures heavily depends on the assumed loading condition [30], [36], [37]. From among numerous possible methods to assess the fatigue life, the most frequent approach bases on local strains, or local stresses [38], [39], [40], [41], [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the scatter of experimental data is larger for thin plates in comparison to thick plates [12]. In steel sandwich panels, where the plate thickness is significantly smaller, neither the structural or notch stress approaches give reasonable results for fatigue strength, and an energy or J-integral based assessment method has to be used instead [19], [20], [21], [22]. However, it is seen that the slope of the fatigue resistance curve can be even higher than with structural and notch stress approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%