2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue of metals – What the designer needs?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, referring to Figure at loading level in the plastic regime (145 MPa) near the failure, the maximum temperature variation of duplex steel is approximately of 1°C, while 3.5°C at 115 MPa and 2°C at 220 MPa were obtained for AISI 316 and 17‐4 PH, respectively. It is worth noting that the temperature variations of austenitic and martensitic stainless steels are in agreement with the temperature changes reported in literature …”
Section: Discussion Of the Correlation Between Temperature Variationssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, referring to Figure at loading level in the plastic regime (145 MPa) near the failure, the maximum temperature variation of duplex steel is approximately of 1°C, while 3.5°C at 115 MPa and 2°C at 220 MPa were obtained for AISI 316 and 17‐4 PH, respectively. It is worth noting that the temperature variations of austenitic and martensitic stainless steels are in agreement with the temperature changes reported in literature …”
Section: Discussion Of the Correlation Between Temperature Variationssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is worth noting that the temperature variations of austenitic and martensitic stainless steels are in agreement with the temperature changes reported in literature. [4][5][6]23,32 The temperature variation of duplex is lower than in austenitic and martensitic material, even if the material experiences large deformations, as represented by Figure 13. In this figure, in effect, the ductile behaviour of duplex is confirmed: the deformation (170 mm) is nearly equivalent to that of AISI 316 which is 200 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations