1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(97)00068-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue of foam core sandwich beams—2: effect of initial damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both interface debonds and flawed butt-joints were also tested in fatigue load using the same type of material configurations and test set-up [15,16]. In a similar study [17] also beam configurations with honeycomb cores were tested in fatigue.…”
Section: Disbonds In Sandwich Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both interface debonds and flawed butt-joints were also tested in fatigue load using the same type of material configurations and test set-up [15,16]. In a similar study [17] also beam configurations with honeycomb cores were tested in fatigue.…”
Section: Disbonds In Sandwich Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good summary of what has been done can be found in [1]. Some early work was performed by Burman et al [2][3], Shenoi et al [4], Buene et al [5] and Kanny and Mahfuz [6]. Kanny and Mahfuz [7] and Kulkarni et al [8] performed fatigue testing of foam core sandwich beams with polymer foam cores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their situation was similar to this report in that the damaged area was small relative to either the width or length of the structure. In contrast, Burman and Zenkert (1997) found reduced fatigue performance for plates with manufactured core/skin disbonds. While it is not stated in their report, we suspect that the manufactured disbonds spanned the width of the specimens.…”
Section: Introduction Tmentioning
confidence: 88%