2020
DOI: 10.1177/1754337120905674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue monitoring of climbing ropes

Abstract: Safety improvements in mountaineering gear have enabled the increasing popularity of rock climbing as a sport. Both amateurs and experts want to know the condition of their equipment with a high degree of reliability. For climbing ropes, diagnostics are only carried out qualitatively by visual inspection. The assessment is left to the personal judgment of the user, thus leaving considerable margins of uncertainty on the rope’s condition. To address this shortcoming, this article explores the possibility of est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To put the present results (maximum force approximately 6 kN) in context, for the half ropes, the maximum force in the first UIAA standard drop must be lower than 8 kN. Other studies showed an increase of approximately 11%-23% during the second drop after the first drop was conducted [46][47][48] and an increase of approximately 5%-11% in the case of wet ropes, 9,11 depending on the rope. 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…To put the present results (maximum force approximately 6 kN) in context, for the half ropes, the maximum force in the first UIAA standard drop must be lower than 8 kN. Other studies showed an increase of approximately 11%-23% during the second drop after the first drop was conducted [46][47][48] and an increase of approximately 5%-11% in the case of wet ropes, 9,11 depending on the rope. 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%