Comprehensive Composite Materials 2000
DOI: 10.1016/b0-08-042993-9/00093-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue in Ceramic Matrix Composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Finally, they are less fatigue-prone than metals and alloys with stress threshold below which no fatigue failure occurs, of the order of 75% the ultimate failure stress under static loading. 20 The tensile stress-strain behavior of SiC-matrix composites does not change markedly up to % 11001C. However, some change may be observed either at higher temperatures if the fibers are limited in thermal stability (case of the unstable Si-C-O fibers) or even at lower temperatures when an oxidizing atmosphere has access to the fibers and the interphase (case of insufficiently protected materials).…”
Section: Mechanical Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 Finally, they are less fatigue-prone than metals and alloys with stress threshold below which no fatigue failure occurs, of the order of 75% the ultimate failure stress under static loading. 20 The tensile stress-strain behavior of SiC-matrix composites does not change markedly up to % 11001C. However, some change may be observed either at higher temperatures if the fibers are limited in thermal stability (case of the unstable Si-C-O fibers) or even at lower temperatures when an oxidizing atmosphere has access to the fibers and the interphase (case of insufficiently protected materials).…”
Section: Mechanical Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SiC‐matrix composites are tough when properly designed and fabricated with toughness, expressed in terms of critical energy release rate of the order of 10 kJ/m 2 , whereas that of monolithic SiC‐ceramics is of the order of a few 100 J/m 2 15 . Finally, they are less fatigue‐prone than metals and alloys with stress threshold below which no fatigue failure occurs, of the order of 75% the ultimate failure stress under static loading 20 …”
Section: Selected Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the structural elements mechanical properties (most especially strength) statistical distribution over the body volume can also significantly affect the fracture process modeling results [23,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. This feature was widely discussed in problems of fibrous composites (consisting a large number of filaments with various strength properties [43,[46][47]) properties prediction [46,[48][49]. However, a small number of works investigate the damaging processes of elastic-brittle solids with stress concentrators taking into account the strength characteristics distribution, which may cause not only the load bearing capacity change, but the fracture mechanisms conversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%