2010
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2009.2033710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue Evaluation for a Ferritic Stainless Steel (SUS430) by the Eddy Current Method Using the Pancake-Type Coil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 (b) shows the same relation as Fig. 8 (a), when N was 2x10 6 . In these cases, Nd magnets were not installed.…”
Section: S-n Curve Of the Specimensupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 (b) shows the same relation as Fig. 8 (a), when N was 2x10 6 . In these cases, Nd magnets were not installed.…”
Section: S-n Curve Of the Specimensupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In such a research situation, our group has researched which deterioration in stainless steels and low carbon steel is evaluated by the residual magnetization method [5] and the eddy current testing (ECT) method. In our previous research results, the ECT method attained good results in the detection of fatigue in the metallic components caused by the plane bending fatigue and partially pulsating stress [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the phase angle was measured by the linear effect of distance between the tested surface of the steel sheet and probe. This parameter is dependent on many factors, such as: internal stress changes, local changes in the composition, density or the phase composition [2][3][4][5][6][7], and therefore an attempt was made to use it to identify changes in the rolling surface. The measurement of the phase angle was made using the software available in the commercial Zetec device.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current systems for detecting materials damage are: the acoustic emission technique [2], ultrasound techniques [8], acousto-ultrasonic sensing using fiber Bragg gratings [1], laser vibrometry [7], digital image correlation [9], Eddy's current method [5], penetration methods [11], radiographic methods [6] and subjective visual methods. There are not many methods for quickly detecting material damages in the conditions of magnetic and electrical disturbances as well as flammable and chemically aggressive ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%