2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue damage evolution and lifetime prediction of welded joints with the consideration of residual stresses and porosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The in uence of residual stress on fatigue performance depends on the applied stress ratio [24,25]. The initial residual stress tends to relax during the cycle loading process, and the extent of relaxation depends on plastic strain caused by the increasing applied load, and if the applied tensile mean stress is high enough, the effect of the residual tensile stresses generally vanish [24][25][26][27][28][29]. In the elastic zone of low applied mean stress, the combination of residual tensile stress and applied load increases the mean stress and makes the welded joint seem to work under higher loads, thereby reducing the high-cycle fatigue resistance, whereas the residual stress does not contribute to the plastic collapse at crack tips [24][25][26], which coincides with the fatigue fractograph of the high-cycle failure 0.8-1.5-N joint without plastic region.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in uence of residual stress on fatigue performance depends on the applied stress ratio [24,25]. The initial residual stress tends to relax during the cycle loading process, and the extent of relaxation depends on plastic strain caused by the increasing applied load, and if the applied tensile mean stress is high enough, the effect of the residual tensile stresses generally vanish [24][25][26][27][28][29]. In the elastic zone of low applied mean stress, the combination of residual tensile stress and applied load increases the mean stress and makes the welded joint seem to work under higher loads, thereby reducing the high-cycle fatigue resistance, whereas the residual stress does not contribute to the plastic collapse at crack tips [24][25][26], which coincides with the fatigue fractograph of the high-cycle failure 0.8-1.5-N joint without plastic region.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several fatigue damage models are proposed to predict fatigue life and better describe the fatigue damage evolution of materials under fatigue loads. These models have been effectively employed in such fatigue fields as impact, fretting, additive manufacturing, and welding . Recently, some researchers have devoted their efforts to assessing the fatigue behaviour of welded joints by CDM‐based approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models have been effectively employed in such fatigue fields as impact, 18 fretting, 19 additive manufacturing, and welding. [20][21][22][23] Recently, some researchers have devoted their efforts to assessing the fatigue behaviour of welded joints by CDM-based approaches. Lautrou et al 24 predicted the fatigue crack initiation lives of S355NL steel welded joints with a twoscale damage model considering the welding residual stresses and obtained a satisfactory result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, there is an imminent urge to develop a method to comprehensively consider the weld‐induced residual stresses, initial damage, as well as the interactive relationship between the fatigue damage and residual stresses, when evaluating the fatigue property of welded structures. The continuum damage mechanics (CDMs) could be a suitable candidate because of its advantageous ability for describing the mechanical performance of a deteriorated material and for calculating the progressive damage by developing damage‐coupled constitutive model and thermodynamics‐based damage evolution laws . Do et al developed a nonlinear damage cumulative model, based on the CDM approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%