2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue assessment of highway steel bridges in presence of seismic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The safety of such infrastructures has posed a critical concern for countries residing in the cold region. [8][9][10][11][12] However, the Paris material constants used in estimating the fatigue life in these design codes derive primarily from the experimental database recorded at the room temperature. 2,3 A number of design procedures [4][5][6][7] have evolved for the fatigue prone structural details, based on a Paris type crack propagation rule, to assess the fatigue performance of steel bridges and Nomenclature: a, = crack length; a 0 , = initial crack length at the end of fatigue pre-cracking; A, = percentage of elongation at fracture; B, = thickness of the compact tension, C(T), specimen; C, = Paris-law coefficient; C 0 , = coefficient of stress intensity factor gradient method; E, = elastic modulus; f y , = yield strength; f u , = ultimate tensile strength; K I , = stress intensity factor; ΔK I , = stress intensity factor range; ΔK th , = fatigue crack propagation threshold; m, = exponent of the Paris-law; N, = number of loading cycles; P max , = maximum load; ΔP, = applied cyclic load range; R, = stress ratio; R 2 , = correlation coefficient; T, = temperature; T 27J , = fracture ductile-to-brittle transition temperature at which the Charpy impact energy is 27 J; T SA , = fracture ductile-to-brittle transition temperature at which the percent shear area of fracture surface in a Charpy specimen is 50%; T t , = fracture ductile-tobrittle transition temperature based on Boltzmann function; W, = width of compact tension, C(T), specimen; Z, = percentage of area reduction other welded steel structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 The safety of such infrastructures has posed a critical concern for countries residing in the cold region. [8][9][10][11][12] However, the Paris material constants used in estimating the fatigue life in these design codes derive primarily from the experimental database recorded at the room temperature. 2,3 A number of design procedures [4][5][6][7] have evolved for the fatigue prone structural details, based on a Paris type crack propagation rule, to assess the fatigue performance of steel bridges and Nomenclature: a, = crack length; a 0 , = initial crack length at the end of fatigue pre-cracking; A, = percentage of elongation at fracture; B, = thickness of the compact tension, C(T), specimen; C, = Paris-law coefficient; C 0 , = coefficient of stress intensity factor gradient method; E, = elastic modulus; f y , = yield strength; f u , = ultimate tensile strength; K I , = stress intensity factor; ΔK I , = stress intensity factor range; ΔK th , = fatigue crack propagation threshold; m, = exponent of the Paris-law; N, = number of loading cycles; P max , = maximum load; ΔP, = applied cyclic load range; R, = stress ratio; R 2 , = correlation coefficient; T, = temperature; T 27J , = fracture ductile-to-brittle transition temperature at which the Charpy impact energy is 27 J; T SA , = fracture ductile-to-brittle transition temperature at which the percent shear area of fracture surface in a Charpy specimen is 50%; T t , = fracture ductile-tobrittle transition temperature based on Boltzmann function; W, = width of compact tension, C(T), specimen; Z, = percentage of area reduction other welded steel structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 A number of design procedures [4][5][6][7] have evolved for the fatigue prone structural details, based on a Paris type crack propagation rule, to assess the fatigue performance of steel bridges and Nomenclature: a, = crack length; a 0 , = initial crack length at the end of fatigue pre-cracking; A, = percentage of elongation at fracture; B, = thickness of the compact tension, C(T), specimen; C, = Paris-law coefficient; C 0 , = coefficient of stress intensity factor gradient method; E, = elastic modulus; f y , = yield strength; f u , = ultimate tensile strength; K I , = stress intensity factor; ΔK I , = stress intensity factor range; ΔK th , = fatigue crack propagation threshold; m, = exponent of the Paris-law; N, = number of loading cycles; P max , = maximum load; ΔP, = applied cyclic load range; R, = stress ratio; R 2 , = correlation coefficient; T, = temperature; T 27J , = fracture ductile-to-brittle transition temperature at which the Charpy impact energy is 27 J; T SA , = fracture ductile-to-brittle transition temperature at which the percent shear area of fracture surface in a Charpy specimen is 50%; T t , = fracture ductile-tobrittle transition temperature based on Boltzmann function; W, = width of compact tension, C(T), specimen; Z, = percentage of area reduction other welded steel structures. [8][9][10][11][12] However, the Paris material constants used in estimating the fatigue life in these design codes derive primarily from the experimental database recorded at the room temperature. Their validity of these parameters at a low ambient temperature requires further validation for enhanced fatigue assessment of welded components in steel bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the linear elastic fracture mechanics approach, a series of corresponding design procedures [4][5][6][7] have been developed for fatigue-prone structural details in order to evaluate the fatigue performances of polar ships and other welded steel structures. 8,9 However, most of these studies only focused on the crack growth parameters in Paris law at room temperature, and the data used to estimate these parameters came primarily from experimental data, which were recorded at room temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress analysis based on numerical simulation is vastly used to evaluate the fatigue performance of steel bridges [5][6][7][8][9][10]. In general, the finite element model (FEM) of the steel bridge is first established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%