2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fate of imidacloprid in soil and plant after application to cotton seeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to the latter factor, higher accumulation of TMX at the tips of rice leaves than in basal regions of leaves after foliar treatment has been reported . Similarly, in cotton treated as seeds with imidacloprid, insecticidal concentrations were higher in apical portions of leaf blades than in central portions …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With respect to the latter factor, higher accumulation of TMX at the tips of rice leaves than in basal regions of leaves after foliar treatment has been reported . Similarly, in cotton treated as seeds with imidacloprid, insecticidal concentrations were higher in apical portions of leaf blades than in central portions …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The measurements were: pH 6.0, organic matter 17.24 g kg −1 , cation exchange capacity 21.61 cmol kg −1 . Soil samples were pretreated by the method of Sarkar et al 18 Soil sterilisation was done according to the method by El‐Hamady et al 8…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, soil stability should involve chemical and biological degradation,5 and therefore it is still unclear whether neonicotinoid insecticides undergo chemical degradation and whether soil microbial degradation is predominant. El‐Hamady et al 8 investigated the influence of plant and soil microbes on the degradation of IMI after its application as dressing of cotton seeds and the mass balance of this compound in soil and cotton plants. However, they did not obtain a definite result concerning the relationship of soil microbes and the persistence of IMI, and the metabolic pathway and persistence of bioefficacy of IMI in soil were not involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….). It was first introduced in 1991 for the treatment of corn [2,6], cereals [3,7,8], sunflower [9], cotton [10], . .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%