2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fate of dissolved organic nitrogen in two stage trickling filter process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
30
0
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
30
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Corresponding to nitrite concentrations, nitrate concentrations were high for final effluent samples. They show the same trend as the data for the Fargo WWTF (Simsek et al, 2012;Liu, et al, 2013). …”
Section: Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen (Din) Speciessupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Corresponding to nitrite concentrations, nitrate concentrations were high for final effluent samples. They show the same trend as the data for the Fargo WWTF (Simsek et al, 2012;Liu, et al, 2013). …”
Section: Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen (Din) Speciessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The plants process achieved almost complete ammonia removal during the wastewater treatment processes in three different plants, process in the ITP does not remove ammonia may be because of the toxicity of high oxygen concentration to the nitrifying microorganisms (Uemoto et al, 2000). Similar to the Fargo WWTF results, ammonia inall the samples were totally nitrified during the incubation (Pehlivanoglu-Mantas and Sedlak, 2008; Simsek et al, 2012, Liu, et al, 2013.…”
Section: Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen (Din) Speciessupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parkin and McCarty (1981) reported that about 70% of the total influent DON can be removed in suspended growth systems of WWTFs. Simsek et al (2012) reported that 62% of the influent DON was removed by a trickling filter (TF) treatment process. The effluent DON was 50% and 51% biodegradable (ammonifiable) for activated sludge (AS) and TF WWTFs, respectively (Murthy et al, 2006;Simsek et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simsek et al (2012) reported that 62% of the influent DON was removed by a trickling filter (TF) treatment process. The effluent DON was 50% and 51% biodegradable (ammonifiable) for activated sludge (AS) and TF WWTFs, respectively (Murthy et al, 2006;Simsek et al, 2012). Traditionally effluent DON was believed to be fully nonbiodegradable and hence would not be available as a nutrient source in receiving waters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%