2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fate-mapping of the epithelial seam during palatal fusion rules out epithelial–mesenchymal transformation

Abstract: During palatogenesis, fusion of the palatine shelves is a crucial event, the failure of which results in the birth defect, cleft palate. The fate of the midline epithelial seam (MES), which develops transiently upon contact of the two palatine shelves, is still strongly debated. Three major mechanisms underlying the regression of the MES upon palatal fusion have been proposed: (1) apoptosis has been evidenced by morphological and molecular criteria; (2) epithelial-mesenchymal transformation has been suggested … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
110
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
7
110
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Early patterning of the oral ectoderm is independent of the neural crest (Veitch et al, 1999). In the mouse model, the branchial arch epithelium is correctly patterned, despite the CNC migration defect (Gavalas et al, 2001).…”
Section: Orofacial Ectodermmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early patterning of the oral ectoderm is independent of the neural crest (Veitch et al, 1999). In the mouse model, the branchial arch epithelium is correctly patterned, despite the CNC migration defect (Gavalas et al, 2001).…”
Section: Orofacial Ectodermmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is strong evidence that disruption of the palatal epithelial seam during palatal fusion results at least in part from apoptosis (Cecconi et al, 1998;Cuervo and Covarrubias, 2004;Martinez-Alvarez et al, 2004;Vaziri Sani et al, 2005). We carried out terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferasemediated deoxyuridinetriphosphate nick end-labeling (TUNEL) analysis to investigate the mechanism involved in the disruption of the epithelial seam between the palate and tongue in the Jag2 ⌬DSL/⌬DSL mutants and found that the palate-tongue seam contained numerous apoptotic cells, similar to the wild-type palate-palate seam during palatal fusion (Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Jag2 Mutants Provides Support For the Role Of Tgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tgf␤3 has been proposed to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of the palatal MEE (Kaartinen et al, 1997;Sun et al, 1998;reviewed in Nawshad et al, 2004). However, recent fate mapping of the mouse palatal MEE cells using the Cre/loxP-mediated in vivo lineage tracing method has ruled out MEE contribution to the palatal mesenchyme (Vaziri Sani et al, 2005). On the other hand, the fusing palatal epithelial seam cells have been shown to undergo apoptosis both in vivo and in vitro (Cuervo and Covarrubias, 2004;Vaziri Sani et al, 2005).…”
Section: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms Underlying The Aberrant Ormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The confusion may have arisen due in part to species differences (e.g., chick vs. mouse and human) in facial morphogenesis and in part to lack of synthesis of the fragmentary and often incomplete information gained from individual studies. Moreover, whereas it has been widely accepted that epithelial-mesenchymal transformation (EMT) of the epithelial seam is the major mechanism for both lip and palate fusion (Fitchett and Hay, 1989;Shuler et al, 1991Shuler et al, , 1992Griffith and Hay, 1992;Hay, 1995Hay, , 2005Sun et al, 2000;Cox, 2004;Nawshad et al, 2004), recent studies have challenged this theory and demonstrated that the palatal epithelial seam gradually regresses by programmed cell death rather than by EMT (Cuervo and Covarrubias, 2004;Vaziri Sani et al, 2005). At the molecular level, recent studies in chick and mice have identified specific roles for several major signaling pathways, including Bmp, Fgf, and Shh signaling pathways in midfacial morphogenesis (Hu and Helms, 1999;Trumpp et al, 1999;Ashique et al, 2002;Trokovic et al, 2003;Jeong et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%