Abstract:Conclusions 7 5 Suggestions for Future Studies 7 Acknowledgments References 7 Appendix A 29. Schematic geologic cross section of middle Key Largo and bar graph of major nutrient concentrations 69 30. Schematic geologic cross section of upper Key Largo and bar graph of major nutrient concentrations 7 0 IV Florida reef tract. Grainstone is approximately an order of magnitude less permeable than the coralline Key Largo Limestone facies. The Q3 surface, a major subsurface unconformity thought to form an effective … Show more
“…The nearshore reefs occur less than 5 km offshore and often experience extremely turbid waters. Although waters close to the Florida Keys tend to be slightly elevated in their nutrient concentrations and, based on the studies by Shinn et al (1994) and Lapointe et al (1990), might be expected to be affected by sewage derived from the Florida Keys, by 0.5 km, it has been shown that the nutrient concentrations of the reefal water are close to open marine conditions (Szmant and Forrester 1996). If the ␦ 15 N of organisms, such as corals, can be considered to be valid indicators of anthropogenic influence on the marine environment, then the data presented in this paper would suggest that the Florida reefs are relatively unaffected by anthropogenic N. Such results are in contrast with the study by Sammarco et al (1999), which examined a number of reefs stretching from the coast of Australia to the Great Barrier Reef, a distance of 120 km.…”
Tissues were collected from Montastraea faveolata at five locations on the Florida Reef tract representing both nearshore and offshore environments. The tissue and zooxanthellae were removed from the skeletons, separated, and subsequently analyzed for ␦ 15 N and ␦
13C. The mean ␦
15N value in the coral tissue was ϩ6.6 (Ϯ0.6‰) while the ␦ 13 C was Ϫ13.3 (Ϯ0.5‰) (n ϭ 197). The ␦ 15 N and ␦ 13 C of the zooxanthellae were ϩ4.7 (Ϯ1.1‰) and Ϫ12.2 (Ϯ1.0‰), respectively (n ϭ 147). The differences in the ␦ 15 N and ␦ 13 C between the zooxanthellae and the tissue were statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were observed between nearshore and offshore stations in either ␦ 15 N or ␦ 13 C. The absence of a difference casts doubt on both whether the ␦ 15 N of the coral tissues is related to anthropogenic influences and/or whether the ␦ 15 N value itself can be used as an indicator of sewage contamination in corals. Between 1995 and 1997, there was an increase of 1‰ in the ␦ 13 C and a decrease of approximately 0.8‰ in the ␦ 15 N. The increase in the ␦ 13 C of the organic material was mimicked in the ␦
13C of the skeletal material from corals from two reefs in the area. There appears to be clear seasonal variations in the ␦ 13 C of the coral tissue at certain locations with ␦ 13 C of the coral tissues and the zooxanthellae becoming more positive between July and August. The difference between the ␦ 13 C of the zooxanthellae and the coral tissue varies seasonally with the maximum difference occurring in July of each year. In contrast, the maximum ␦ 13 C in the skeleton appears to occur later in the year, between September and November.It is well established that certain scleractinian corals have symbiotic associations with dinoflagellate algae (zooxanthellae) that are beneficial to the host (Muscatine and Cernichiari 1969). The zooxanthellae are able to pass organic compounds to the coral, resulting in positive influences on the growth of the coral. Under shallow water conditions, the coral-zooxanthellae system is autotrophic (Muscatine and Cernichiari 1969). Evidence of the autotrophic nature of zooxanthellate corals is found in the difference in the ␦ 13 C of the zooxanthellae and coral tissue at various water depths. At shallow depths, where light intensity is high, the ␦ 13 C of the zooxanthellae and the coral tissue are relatively similar (Land et al. 1975;Muscatine et al. 1989) and the ␦ 13 C of the coral tissue is significantly more positive (Ϫ10‰ to Ϫ14‰) than the supposed food source of the coral, zooplankton (ϳϪ20‰). This indicates that sufficient photosynthate is being translocated so that the ␦ 13 C values of the coral tissue and zooxanthellae are similar. With increasing depth, the ␦ 13 C of the coral tissues become more negative and the ␦ 13 C approaches that of the zooplankton. Such variations are taken as indicating a change from autotrophy to heterotrophy.1 Corresponding author (pswart@rsmas.miami.edu).
AcknowledgmentsThis field work was supported by an NURP grant and, in th...
“…The nearshore reefs occur less than 5 km offshore and often experience extremely turbid waters. Although waters close to the Florida Keys tend to be slightly elevated in their nutrient concentrations and, based on the studies by Shinn et al (1994) and Lapointe et al (1990), might be expected to be affected by sewage derived from the Florida Keys, by 0.5 km, it has been shown that the nutrient concentrations of the reefal water are close to open marine conditions (Szmant and Forrester 1996). If the ␦ 15 N of organisms, such as corals, can be considered to be valid indicators of anthropogenic influence on the marine environment, then the data presented in this paper would suggest that the Florida reefs are relatively unaffected by anthropogenic N. Such results are in contrast with the study by Sammarco et al (1999), which examined a number of reefs stretching from the coast of Australia to the Great Barrier Reef, a distance of 120 km.…”
Tissues were collected from Montastraea faveolata at five locations on the Florida Reef tract representing both nearshore and offshore environments. The tissue and zooxanthellae were removed from the skeletons, separated, and subsequently analyzed for ␦ 15 N and ␦
13C. The mean ␦
15N value in the coral tissue was ϩ6.6 (Ϯ0.6‰) while the ␦ 13 C was Ϫ13.3 (Ϯ0.5‰) (n ϭ 197). The ␦ 15 N and ␦ 13 C of the zooxanthellae were ϩ4.7 (Ϯ1.1‰) and Ϫ12.2 (Ϯ1.0‰), respectively (n ϭ 147). The differences in the ␦ 15 N and ␦ 13 C between the zooxanthellae and the tissue were statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were observed between nearshore and offshore stations in either ␦ 15 N or ␦ 13 C. The absence of a difference casts doubt on both whether the ␦ 15 N of the coral tissues is related to anthropogenic influences and/or whether the ␦ 15 N value itself can be used as an indicator of sewage contamination in corals. Between 1995 and 1997, there was an increase of 1‰ in the ␦ 13 C and a decrease of approximately 0.8‰ in the ␦ 15 N. The increase in the ␦ 13 C of the organic material was mimicked in the ␦
13C of the skeletal material from corals from two reefs in the area. There appears to be clear seasonal variations in the ␦ 13 C of the coral tissue at certain locations with ␦ 13 C of the coral tissues and the zooxanthellae becoming more positive between July and August. The difference between the ␦ 13 C of the zooxanthellae and the coral tissue varies seasonally with the maximum difference occurring in July of each year. In contrast, the maximum ␦ 13 C in the skeleton appears to occur later in the year, between September and November.It is well established that certain scleractinian corals have symbiotic associations with dinoflagellate algae (zooxanthellae) that are beneficial to the host (Muscatine and Cernichiari 1969). The zooxanthellae are able to pass organic compounds to the coral, resulting in positive influences on the growth of the coral. Under shallow water conditions, the coral-zooxanthellae system is autotrophic (Muscatine and Cernichiari 1969). Evidence of the autotrophic nature of zooxanthellate corals is found in the difference in the ␦ 13 C of the zooxanthellae and coral tissue at various water depths. At shallow depths, where light intensity is high, the ␦ 13 C of the zooxanthellae and the coral tissue are relatively similar (Land et al. 1975;Muscatine et al. 1989) and the ␦ 13 C of the coral tissue is significantly more positive (Ϫ10‰ to Ϫ14‰) than the supposed food source of the coral, zooplankton (ϳϪ20‰). This indicates that sufficient photosynthate is being translocated so that the ␦ 13 C values of the coral tissue and zooxanthellae are similar. With increasing depth, the ␦ 13 C of the coral tissues become more negative and the ␦ 13 C approaches that of the zooplankton. Such variations are taken as indicating a change from autotrophy to heterotrophy.1 Corresponding author (pswart@rsmas.miami.edu).
AcknowledgmentsThis field work was supported by an NURP grant and, in th...
“…This is of particular concern when waters such as those off the Florida Keys are heavily utilized for recreational activity in addition to being ecologically sensitive to poor water quality, a common trait of all coral reef ecosystems. Several physical factors such as tidal pumping and the porous nature of limestone contribute to the rapid groundwater migration rates observed in many of Florida's coastal communities (145).…”
This review addresses both historical and recent investigations into viral contamination of marine waters. With the relatively recent emergence of molecular biology-based assays, a number of investigations have shown that pathogenic viruses are prevalent in marine waters being impacted by sewage. Research has shown that this group of fecal-oral viral pathogens (enteroviruses, hepatitis A viruses, Norwalk viruses, reoviruses, adenoviruses, rotaviruses, etc.) can cause a broad range of asymptomatic to severe gastrointestinal, respiratory, and eye, nose, ear, and skin infections in people exposed through recreational use of the water. The viruses and the nucleic acid signature survive for an extended period in the marine environment. One of the primary concerns of public health officials is the relationship between the presence of pathogens and the recreational risk to human health in polluted marine environments. While a number of studies have attempted to address this issue, the relationship is still poorly understood. A contributing factor to our lack of progress in the field has been the lack of sensitive methods to detect the broad range of both bacterial and viral pathogens. The application of new and advanced molecular methods will continue to contribute to our current state of knowledge in this emerging and important field
“…Although little is known about groundwater input into Florida Bay, it has been shown that tidal forcing is responsible for subsurface flow and significant localized groundwater input along the Keys (Shinn et al 1994;Corbett et al 1999;Dillon et al 1999Dillon et al , 2000.…”
Groundwater may represent a significant pathway for nutrients and other dissolved solutes into Florida Bay, especially near the Keys where wastewater disposal practices add large amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus to the subsurface each year. Previously, we suggested that high water column inventories of the tracers 222 Rn and CH 4 may be indicative of groundwater discharge. In this study, we employed mass balance calculations to determine that the total benthic fluxes required to maintain the measured water column tracer inventories were significantly larger than diffusive fluxes and varied between 4.2-5.6 dpm m Ϫ2 min Ϫ1 and 5.8-15.4 nmoles m Ϫ2 min Ϫ1 for 222 Rn and CH 4 , respectively. Independent estimates of the diffusive flux and porewater activities/concentrations allowed us to calculate an advective groundwater velocity, assuming that the difference between the total benthic flux (given above) and the diffusive flux is driven by seepage-driven porewater advection. These calculated velocities ranged from 0.2 to 4.3 cm d Ϫ1 for all sites, tracers, and sampling periods, with a best estimate of approximately 1.7 cm d
Ϫ1. These estimates of groundwater velocities compare very well with previous measurements of groundwater flux (1-3 cm d Ϫ1 ) at the same sites via seepage meters.Florida Bay, a mosaic of shallow water banks and deeper water basins, was once characterized by clear waters and healthy seagrass meadows. Massive seagrass die-offs, planktonic algal blooms, and salinity excursions have occurred in the last decade (Boesch et al. 1993;Phlips et al. 1995;Phlips and Badylak 1996;Phlips et al. 1999;Fourqurean and Robblee 1999). There is no simple answer available for what has caused these dramatic events, but it is certain that they are related to a combination of natural phenomena and anthropogenic activities. A better understanding of the complete hydrologic and nutrient budget of Florida Bay is essential for interpreting past and current change, as well as for development of good management strategies for this and other coastal systems.Some patterns of ecological change and environmental degradation in Florida Bay point to increased nutrient loading as one likely cause (Lapointe et al. 1990). However, the sources and pathways of these hypothesized nutrient additions are not clear. Nutrient inputs to the bay include freshwater flowing from the Everglades, Gulf of Mexico waters flowing into the bay, atmospheric deposition, and local sources (Rudnick et al. 1999). Localized inputs include diffusion from sediments, nutrient release during sediment re-
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.