1996
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620151108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fate and disposition of diflubenzuron in rice fields

Abstract: Laboratory and field investigations were undertaken to determine the fate, disposition, and persistence of the insecticide diflubenzuron in California rice culture. Water solubility was similar in distilled/deionized water (88.8 ± 4.0 μg/L) and rice field water (92.6 ± 3.5 μg/L), while the measured Henry's law constant was 2.34 ± 0.02 × 10−1 Pa.m3/mole. Diflubenzuron was rapidly photodegraded in field water primarily to the more stable chlorophenylurea and difluorobenzoic acid; field water photolysate was equa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no loss of mobility in any zero-concentration controls for the duration of the study, as shown in Table 4. The literature EC50 values for diflubenzuron and imidacloprid are 5 and 102 000 µg/L, respectively (Mabury and Crosby 1996;Raby et al 2018) In a comparison between the values determined in the present study and those found in the literature, it appears that the current method is under-reporting the EC50 by 33 and 67% for diflubenzuron and imidacloprid, respectively. When this is taken into consideration, the EC50 value for sulfoxaflor still falls below that reported by the manufacturer of >399 000 µg/L (Dow AgroSciences 2014).…”
Section: Sulfoxaflor Photolysissupporting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was no loss of mobility in any zero-concentration controls for the duration of the study, as shown in Table 4. The literature EC50 values for diflubenzuron and imidacloprid are 5 and 102 000 µg/L, respectively (Mabury and Crosby 1996;Raby et al 2018) In a comparison between the values determined in the present study and those found in the literature, it appears that the current method is under-reporting the EC50 by 33 and 67% for diflubenzuron and imidacloprid, respectively. When this is taken into consideration, the EC50 value for sulfoxaflor still falls below that reported by the manufacturer of >399 000 µg/L (Dow AgroSciences 2014).…”
Section: Sulfoxaflor Photolysissupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Following a procedure established by Mabury and Crosby (1996) 1-L solutions of sulfoxaflor at a concentration of 250 µg/L in filtered river water were irradiated by simulated sunlight for a period of 1 (t 50% ), 2 (t 25% ), and 3 (t 12.5% ) half-lives, using direct photolysis to produce the sulfoxaflor-OH photolysate. This concentration was selected as approximately one-half the EC50 of sulfoxaflor as determined in the present study.…”
Section: Photolysate Toxicity To Daphniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diflubenzuron is registered with EPA as a terrestrial insecticide. Potential data have been reported for guidelines 835.1230-adsorption/desorption (table 2.15; Sundaram and others, 1997), 835.2240-photodegradation in water (Mabury and Crosby, 1996), 835.6200-aquatic (sediment; Mabury and Crosby, 1996), and 875.1100-human applicator dermal exposure (Roitzsch and others 2019). The data gaps for registration includes: 870.6200-acute neurotoxicity, 158.660-nontarget plant protection data, and human exposure (Subpart K), except 875.240-post-application human dermal exposure and 875.2200-post-application human soil residue dissipation, as identified in tables 1-4..…”
Section: Registration Data Gaps For Diflubenzuronmentioning
confidence: 99%