2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatal Zika virus infection in the Americas: A systematic review

Abstract: Introduction: While death due to Zika virus (ZIKV) infection has been described, reports of fatal cases have been infrequent and no systematic reviews on the subject have been published. Methods: A systematic review of the literature in four databases was performed to assess fatal outcomes of postnatal ZIKV infection and the available evidence that links ZIKV infection to death. Results: Three hundred and eleven articles were retrieved; 20 of them were epidemiological reports from surveillance agencies and min… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of these reports have started to answer clinical questions, including evolution and outcomes, as well as potential risk factors, and clinical, laboratory and image findings; however, a systematic review to consolidate what has been learned from each study or reported case is to-date missing. Although systematic reviews and meta-analyses usually include randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and aim to provide a more precise estimate of the effect of a treatment or risk factor for disease, also have been extensively used, especially during the last decades, to synthesized observational studies [31][32][33]. In many situations, RCTs are not feasible or available, and only data from observational studies are accessible [33].…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these reports have started to answer clinical questions, including evolution and outcomes, as well as potential risk factors, and clinical, laboratory and image findings; however, a systematic review to consolidate what has been learned from each study or reported case is to-date missing. Although systematic reviews and meta-analyses usually include randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and aim to provide a more precise estimate of the effect of a treatment or risk factor for disease, also have been extensively used, especially during the last decades, to synthesized observational studies [31][32][33]. In many situations, RCTs are not feasible or available, and only data from observational studies are accessible [33].…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare this with a mean case fatality rate of 0.02% from ZIKV illustrated in a systematic review of ZIKV in the Americas. [128] In subjects with confirmed ZIKV and GBS, admission rate to the ICU was 50% and mortality rate was 3%. Consistent with our findings, Leonhard et al report in all cases, 49% admission rate to ICU and a mortality rate of 1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the outbreak in Yap State "initiates" the events that would make ZIKV a potential pandemic threat and are briefly described in Figure 1. Other publications describe these milestones in more detail [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Fundamental Aspects Of Zika Virus and Zika Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%