Fatal river drowning: the identification of research gaps through a systematic literature review

Abstract

IntroductionDrowning is a leading cause of unintentional death. Rivers are a common location for drowning. Unlike other location-specific prevention efforts (home swimming pools and beaches), little is known about prevention targeting river drowning deaths.MethodsA systematic literature review was undertaken using English language papers published between 1980 and 2014, exploring gaps in the literature, with a focus on epidemiology, risk factors and prevention strategies for river drowning.ResultsTwenty-nine papers were deemed relevant to the study design including 21 (72.4%) on epidemiology, 18 (62.1%) on risk factors and 10 (34.5%) that proposed strategies for prevention. Risk factors identified included age, falls into water, swimming, using watercraft, sex and alcohol.DiscussionGaps were identified in the published literature. These included a lack of an agreed definition for rivers, rates for fatal river drowning (however, crude rates were calculated for 12 papers, ranging from 0.20 to 1.89 per 100 000 people per annum), and consensus around risk factors, especially age. There was only one paper that explored a prevention programme; the remaining nine outlined proposed prevention activities. There is a need for studies into exposure patterns for rivers and an agreed definition (with consistent coding).ConclusionsThis systematic review has identified that river drowning deaths are an issue in many regions and countries around the world. Further work to address gaps in the published research to date would benefit prevention efforts.

Swimming as an accretive practice in healthy blue space

“…While there were some judgmental comments on the risky behavior of the youthful divers, older swimmers, 'who should know better' were also identified as disregarding their own, and at times, others safety. Given known associations between rivers and suicide (Peden et al, 2016), the breaking of the water referred to by Sherr (2012) may equally see broken water closing behind people in more definitive ways.…”

Ranking regional drowning mortality rates: population-based versus aquatic area-based rate

“…A recent study also suggested that drowning prevention interventions based on site-specific locations are likely to have a greater impact than general strategies aimed at preventing drowning 7. This is the first study, to the best of our knowledge, to calculate the drowning mortality rate using aquatic area as the denominator.…”

“…Calculation of the drowning rate using population as the denominator will underestimate the risk of drowning, as it includes many people who are never or very rarely exposed to water and consequently, to the risk of drowning 9. In a systematic review of fatal river drowning studies, Peden et al 7 suggested that population-based rates do not take exposure into account and recommended that future studies should aim to identify exposure at river locations to calculate a more accurate drowning rate. To better identify regions with a higher risk of drowning deaths, we sought in this study to compare the rankings of regional drowning mortality rates according to population-based versus aquatic area-based rates in Taitung County, Taiwan.…”

Measuring Australian Children’s Water Safety Knowledge: The National Water Safety Quiz

“…Further work is required to improve rivers and rescue knowledge, areas in which our understanding has improved over the last few years (Franklin & Pearn, 2011;Pearn & Franklin, 2012;Peden, Franklin, & Leggat, 2016a). Overall, females demonstrated higher levels of knowledge on all categories when compared to males.…”