Fatal flaws in clinical decision making

Abstract

Background Clinical decision making is a core competency of surgical practice, involving a continuous and evolving process of data interpretation and evaluation. The aim of this article is twofold. First, to recognize patient deaths where a clinical incident arose following unsatisfactory clinical decision making, determining where in the clinical decision‐making process each failure occurred. Second, to discuss and explore individual incidents to provide lessons from which the surgical community can learn. Methods Using the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality database, all deaths from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 were analysed. All deaths in which the surgeon or assessor identified an aspect of patient management that was inadequate were recognized. Clinical incidents deemed by the assessor to be an area of concern or an adverse event were individually reviewed to determine if a clinical decision‐making incident (CDMI) occurred. CDMIs were categorized into various themes depending on the nature of the incident. Results A total of 3422 fully audited deaths occurred throughout the study period; from these cases, 226 individual CDMIs were identified. Decision to operate was the most commonly identified CDMI (n = 99, 43.8%), followed by diagnostic error (n = 49, 21.7%). The least common CDMI identified was inadequate post‐operative assessment (n = 14, 6.2%). Conclusion This paper demonstrates thought‐provoking examples of clinical decision‐making failure implicated in patient death. Clinical decision‐making failures most commonly occur around the decision to operate with increased discussion of complex cases possibly required. Further CDMI evaluation should be considered to complement more traditional methods of surgical mortality evaluation.

Potentially avoidable issues in urology mortality cases in Australia: identification and improvements

“…reflect this practice, highlighting that in patients who are candidates for invasive surgery such as radical cystectomy, a careful selection protocol is paramount. The decision to operate was found to be the most common clinical decision‐making error by Davis et al . in an ANZASM study which looked at fatal flaws in clinical decision‐making.…”

Triage and outcomes for a whole cohort of patients presenting for major emergency abdominal surgery including the No-LAP population: a prospective single-center observational study

“…The results of our study, and the results presented by McIlveen et al indicate potential large differences in preoperative decision-making which may have an immense effect on patient related outcomes [23]. Decision-making in emergency abdominal surgery is challenging due to a large heterogeneity in patient-related factors i.e.…”

Triage and Outcomes for a Whole Cohort of Patients Presenting for Major Emergency Abdominal Surgery Including the No-LAP Population: A Prospective Single-Center Observational Study

“…The results of our study, and the results presented by McIlveen et al indicate potential large differences in the complex procedure of pre-operative decision-making which may have an immense effect on patient outcomes [20]. Decision-making in emergency abdominal surgery is challenging due to a large heterogeneity in patient-related factors i.e.…”

“…Other well-established factors affecting decision making include surgeons' clinical and operative experience, perception of risks and bene ts of operative and non-operative treatment, external pressure to operate i.e. from patients or their relatives, and culture [1,7,9,20,21].…”