2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2009.00374.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatal cross infection by carbapenem‐resistant Klebsiella in two liver transplant recipients

Abstract: Members of the family Enterobacteriaceae including Klebsiella have re-emerged as major pathogens in solid organ transplantation. The recent appearance and dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Europe and the northeastern United States represents a major challenge to the treatment of enteric gram-negative bacterial infections in immunocompromised patients; however, few reports have detailed the outcomes of such infections. Here we report two cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
62
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
9
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, CRE infections in liver transplant recipients have been reported as the index cases of CRE in hospital outbreaks. 32,87 In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published a toolkit providing guidance on the prevention of CRE in healthcare facilities. Updated recommendations in November 2015 included optimizing compliance with hand hygiene and contact precautions, healthcare personnel education, minimizing the use of indwelling devices such as central venous catheters, endotracheal tubes, and urinary catheters, antimicrobial stewardship, environmental cleaning, patient and staff cohorting, screening contacts of CRE patients, active surveillance, and chlorhexidine bathing.…”
Section: Prevention Of Cre Infection In Transplant and Hematologic Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, CRE infections in liver transplant recipients have been reported as the index cases of CRE in hospital outbreaks. 32,87 In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published a toolkit providing guidance on the prevention of CRE in healthcare facilities. Updated recommendations in November 2015 included optimizing compliance with hand hygiene and contact precautions, healthcare personnel education, minimizing the use of indwelling devices such as central venous catheters, endotracheal tubes, and urinary catheters, antimicrobial stewardship, environmental cleaning, patient and staff cohorting, screening contacts of CRE patients, active surveillance, and chlorhexidine bathing.…”
Section: Prevention Of Cre Infection In Transplant and Hematologic Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported mortality rates among SOT recipients with CRE infection generally range from 30-50%, and post-transplant CRKP infections have been associated with as much as a 10-fold risk of death. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] However, a more recent cohort of 164 SOT recipients across 15 international sites confirmed that while CRE infection typically occurs in the early post-transplant period, the one-year survival rate of patients who developed CRE infection within the first year of transplant was 72%. 34 While CRKP infections remain the most common type of CRE infection in SOT recipients, infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter spp., as well as NDM-and OXA-48-producing K. pneumoniae have also been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4] Hence, different preventive strategies for patients who are colonized with CR-KP have been advocated, and they vary from selective intestinal decontamination to the avoidance of transplantation. However, literature data on the real incidence and timing of invasive infections with CR-KP among colonized patients undergoing LT are limited and confusing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infections due to bacteria producing KPC carbapenemases often have been associated with high mortality in affected patients [31,34,68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%