Abstract:Cosmetic procedures are common and utilize many techniques to obtain aesthetically good outcomes for patient satisfaction with acceptable safety standards. Cosmetic procedures that involve the gluteal region are becoming increasingly popular as various procedures can target the gluteal region such as liposuction, tumescent liposuction, cosmetic filler injections, autologous fat transfer, depot drug delivery, and implants. Complications of cosmetic gluteal procedures can be localized or systemic with systemic c… Show more
“…When compared with gluteal implantation, this procedure improves cosmetic appearance of scars, reduces complications, and has led to increased patient satisfaction with outcomes 1, 2. Common complications with implants and artificial fillers include seromas, capsular contractures, implant migration, wound healing complications, thinning of native tissues, infections, and foreign body responses 3, 5, 6. Lipogranulomas may be an example of foreign body reactions to lipid or oil-like substances, which result from the inability of the body to metabolize exogenous lipids in the tissue interstitium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, surgical excision is not always practical depending on the location and extent of the lesion. Other sources conjecture that complications such as these might be prevented by proper technique in the operating room to ensure viability of the fat cells 3 . However, it seems that these complications may be an inherent risk of the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential risks include common complications such as fat necrosis, seroma formation, and cellulitis 1 . More serious complications have also been reported, including life-threatening infections and potentially fatal fat emboli, especially in gluteal fat transfer 1, 3. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons recently issued a warning identifying gluteal fat grafting as the aesthetic procedure with the highest mortality rate (1 in 3000 procedures) 4 .…”
“…When compared with gluteal implantation, this procedure improves cosmetic appearance of scars, reduces complications, and has led to increased patient satisfaction with outcomes 1, 2. Common complications with implants and artificial fillers include seromas, capsular contractures, implant migration, wound healing complications, thinning of native tissues, infections, and foreign body responses 3, 5, 6. Lipogranulomas may be an example of foreign body reactions to lipid or oil-like substances, which result from the inability of the body to metabolize exogenous lipids in the tissue interstitium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, surgical excision is not always practical depending on the location and extent of the lesion. Other sources conjecture that complications such as these might be prevented by proper technique in the operating room to ensure viability of the fat cells 3 . However, it seems that these complications may be an inherent risk of the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential risks include common complications such as fat necrosis, seroma formation, and cellulitis 1 . More serious complications have also been reported, including life-threatening infections and potentially fatal fat emboli, especially in gluteal fat transfer 1, 3. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons recently issued a warning identifying gluteal fat grafting as the aesthetic procedure with the highest mortality rate (1 in 3000 procedures) 4 .…”
“…24,34 However, recent recommendations are to limit gluteal fat injection to the subcutaneous plane and to keep continuous motion of the cannula during injection, preventing any bolus deposition of fat. [35][36][37][38][39][40] Implant gluteoplasty patient survey results showed a mean value of 4.25 for overall patient satisfaction (over a scale from 1 to 5). Fat transfer gluteoplasty results showed the mean value of 4.75.…”
The form and size of the female gluteal region have always symbolized beauty and sexuality. There is a remarkable increase in the number of patients seeking gluteoplasty worldwide. Gluteoplasty may be achieved by silicone implant insertion or autologous fat transfer, in addition to other ancillary procedures including liposuction. Careful patient selection and evaluation are needed to assure good results. The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of silicone implants, autologous fat transfer, and liposuction in gluteoplasty. A total of 22 patients underwent gluteoplasty. Intramuscular gluteal implant insertion was employed in 8 patients, whereas autologous fat transfer was employed in 14 patients. The average patient satisfaction (on a scale from 1 to 5) following implant gluteoplasty was 4.25 for the overall aesthetic outcome, whereas the average patient satisfaction following autologous fat transfer gluteoplasty was 4.79 for the overall aesthetic outcome. Both gluteoplasties with silicone implants or fat transfer achieved favorable results, with very good to excellent patients' satisfaction after both procedures, with slightly better satisfaction following autologous fat transfer. Our results are comparable with before published results, with favorable outcomes regarding complications. Liposuction is an important addition that positively affects the aesthetic result. Gluteoplasty using silicone implants or fat transfer, in addition to ancillary liposuction, achieved favorable results, with very good to excellent patients' satisfaction. However, a larger scale study is needed to statistically approve or disapprove to this trend.
“…Severe health problems have been documented in some cases such as pulmonary embolism, renal failure, tissue necrosis, and even fatalities. (1,5,6) Its wide use in cosmetic procedures is due to its low cost, durability and thermal stability. Contrary to what was expected, and despite the fact that injected solutions are chemically inert, they give rise to different levels of local inflammatory reactions and necrosis.…”
The illegal use of liquid silicone products or biopolymers in gluteal augmentation procedures is giving rise to multiple complications, with a significant negative health impact, both in the short and long-term. The migration of polymers to the sacral and lumbar region represents a major limitation to conducting neuraxial anesthesia procedures. This silicon migration is unpredictable through the superficial tissue as is widely described in the literature. Caudal, spinal and epidural anesthesia may cross the silicone in the fascia and contaminate the neural axis with substances that are highly capable of causing inflammation, edema and tissue necrosis. In order to improve the safety of neuraxial anesthetic procedures and avoid the potential risk of dissemination and contamination of the neural axis, this complication must be ruled out, or be considered an emerging contraindication for these anesthetic procedures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.