2009
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2009.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fat distribution in men of different waist girth, fitness level and exercise habit

Abstract: Background: The risk of chronic disease is lower in obese men who are fit and active than obese men who are unfit and inactive. Methods/Objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy were used to assess total and regional adipose tissue in 13 men who were slim, fit and active (the slim-fit), in 12 men who were slim, unfit and inactive (the slim-unfit), in 13 men who were fat, fit and active (the fat-fit) and in 12 men who were fat, unfit and inactive (the fat-unfit), in order to investigate the hypoth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of exercise on insulin sensitivity is also well documented [43], and it is plausible that men who are fat and fit have a greater capacity than men who are fat and unfit to store excess fat in insulin-sensitive adipose tissue rather than the viscera or the liver. Indeed, fatness (waist girth, centimeters) and fitness (VO 2 max, milliliters per kilogram FFM per minute) were independently associated with insulin resistance (HOMA) in the present study; and we have previously reported that visceral fat and liver fat were lower in men who were fat and fit than those who were fat and unfit [44]. Visceral fat is associated with dyslipidemia [9], and it is noteworthy that HDL-C and triglycerides were significantly different in men who were fat and fit and those who were fat and unfit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The effect of exercise on insulin sensitivity is also well documented [43], and it is plausible that men who are fat and fit have a greater capacity than men who are fat and unfit to store excess fat in insulin-sensitive adipose tissue rather than the viscera or the liver. Indeed, fatness (waist girth, centimeters) and fitness (VO 2 max, milliliters per kilogram FFM per minute) were independently associated with insulin resistance (HOMA) in the present study; and we have previously reported that visceral fat and liver fat were lower in men who were fat and fit than those who were fat and unfit [44]. Visceral fat is associated with dyslipidemia [9], and it is noteworthy that HDL-C and triglycerides were significantly different in men who were fat and fit and those who were fat and unfit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Indeed, the phenotype of metabolically healthy obese individuals, as mentioned previously, has reduced fat in the liver (80,90) . Fabbrini et al…”
Section: Obesity In Lean Tissue -The Problem Of Ectopic Fatmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, both groups had mean baseline IHCL concentrations within the normal range (34), making it more difficult to achieve a significant reduction in what were already relatively low levels of liver fat. This may also in part explain why no significant changes in biochemical markers of liver function (AST, ALT, and cGT concentrations) were found in this study.…”
Section: Original Article Obesitymentioning
confidence: 95%