2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104697
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fat- and protein-corrected milk formulation to be used in the life-cycle assessment of Mediterranean dairy goat systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gutierrez-Peña et al [6] also found a 41% difference in CF values for different dairy goat systems, depending on the equation used. These values are similar to those obtained by Mancilla-Leytón et al [7], who, using FPCM calculations for sheep, found an overestimation of 35% due to the higher fat content of sheep milk compared to goat milk. In the case of Equation ( 1), proposed by Mancilla-Leytón et al [7], the obtained kg of FPCM values obtained decreased between 2 and 7% with respect to the real values of milk production (Figure 1).…”
Section: Relevance Of the Standardization Equations Used To Calculate...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Gutierrez-Peña et al [6] also found a 41% difference in CF values for different dairy goat systems, depending on the equation used. These values are similar to those obtained by Mancilla-Leytón et al [7], who, using FPCM calculations for sheep, found an overestimation of 35% due to the higher fat content of sheep milk compared to goat milk. In the case of Equation ( 1), proposed by Mancilla-Leytón et al [7], the obtained kg of FPCM values obtained decreased between 2 and 7% with respect to the real values of milk production (Figure 1).…”
Section: Relevance Of the Standardization Equations Used To Calculate...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…SEM, standard error of means. 2 FPCM; fat and protein corrected milk = M (0.12×FC+0.10×PC+0.23; Mancilla‐Leyton et al., 2021 ). a,b Different letters indicate significant differences between experimental groups ( p < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milk samples were collected each week, and their pH, lactose, fat, protein, solids and solids‐not‐fat (SNF) were determined using a MilkoScan (milkoScan TM FT6000, FossElectric, Denmark). The fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) for the Saanen breed with a milk fat content below 4% is calculated as follows: FPCM = M (0.12× FC+ 0.10× PC+0.23), where M = milk production (Kg), FC = milk fat content (%) and PC = milk protein content (%) (Mancilla‐Leyton et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate the energy content of milk from fat and protein content, the method reported by Mancilla‐Leytón et al. (2021) Also, Kleiber ratios (KR) were determined as KR = ADG/WW 0.75 (Kleiber 1947).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2018; Mancilla‐Leytón et al. 2021). These differences are directly influenced by the production system, genotype, stage of lactation, birth weight, sex, type of birth, prenatal and postnatal period, maternal diet, and weight, and whether the milk is foremilk or hindmilk (Van Sadelhoff et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%