Fat and Hydration Monitoring by Abdominal Bioimpedance Analysis: Data Interpretation by Hierarchical Electrical Modeling

Abstract

In a previous publication, it was demonstrated that the abdominal subcutaneous fat layer thickness (SFL) is strongly correlated with the abdominal electrical impedance when measured with a transversal tetrapolar electrode arrangement. This article addresses the following questions: 1) To which extent do different abdominal compartments contribute to the impedance? 2) How does the hydration state of tissues affect the data? 3) Can hydration and fat content be assessed independently? For simulating the measured data a hierarchical electrical model was built. The abdomen was subdivided into three compartments (subcutaneous fat, muscle, mesentery). The true anatomical structure of the compartment boundaries was modeled using finite-element modeling (FEM). Each compartment is described by an electrical tissue model parameterized in physiological terms. Assuming the same percent change of the fat fraction in the mesentery and the SFL the model predicts a change of 1,24 omega/mm change of the SFL compared to 1,1 omega/mm measured. 42% of the change stem from the SFL, 56% from the mesentery and 2% from changes of fat within the muscle compartment. A 1% increase of the extracellular water in the muscle is not discernible from a 1% decrease of the SFL. The measured data reflect not only the SFL but also the visceral fat. The tetrapolar electrode arrangement allows the measurement of the abdominal fat content only if the hydration remains constant.

Estimation of abdominal fat compartments by bioelectrical impedance: the validity of the ViScan measurement system in comparison with MRI

“…The idea that transimpedance is influenced by fat content of the mesentery (that is, IAAT) was first suggested by Scharfetter et al (2005). Our study showed a strong relationship between ViScan-derived 'visceral fat' and MRI-derived IAAT similar to that reported in the developmental studies of the ViScan against computed tomography (Yamaguchi et al, 2006); however, waist circumference alone explained more of the variance in our cohort.…”

Exercise adherence and intervention effects of two school-based resistance training programs for adolescents

“…(iii) Waist circumference: Nonextensible steel tapes (KDSW-2008) were used to assess waist circumference, which was measured level with the umbilicus to standardize the procedure. (iv) Body composition: Percentage body fat, fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were determined using the Imp™ SFB7 bioelectrical impedance (BIA) analyzer (Moon et al, 2008, Scharfetter et al, 2005. The Imp™ SFB7 is a multifrequency, tetra-polar bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) device (Nielsen et al, 2007).…”

Gravity, the hydrostatic indifference concept and the cardiovascular system

“…When using non-invasive approaches, arterial, venous, and other fluid components may send overlapping signals to the surface. Impedance methodologies do not allow for reliable distinction of signals caused by fluid shifts within (intravascular), outside of (extravascular), or between (filtration) extracellular fluid spaces (Segal et al 1991;Lozano-Nieto and Turner 2001;Scharfetter et al 2005). Developments in mini-invasive pressure monitoring (Della Rocca et al 2008) may offer future paths for experimental observations into the dynamics of hydrostatic indifference locations in humans.…”