1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf01223157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fasting and two-hour post-load glucose levels for the diagnosis of diabetes

Abstract: The frequency distributions of both the fasting and two-hour post-load plasma glucose levels were bimodal in the Pima Indian population aged 25 years and over. The hyperglycaemic component of this distribution represents those with diabetes mellitus, as some 30 percent of this group had evidence of the specific vascular complications of the disease, whereas these abnormalities were virtually absent in those with lower glucose levels. The bimodal characteristics of the frequency distributions were utilized to d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in the high-risk Pima Indian population that demonstrated a bimodal distribution of glucose levels following the OGTT (7,8) helped establish the 2-h value as the diagnostic value of choice, even though most populations had a unimodal distribution of glucose levels (9). Of note, a bimodal distribution was also seen in the fasting glucose samples in the Pimas and other high-risk populations (10,11). However, a discrete fasting plasma glucose (FPG) or 2-h plasma glucose (2HPG) level that separated the bimodal distributions in the Pimas was difficult to identify, with potential FPG and 2HPG cut points ranging from 120 to 160 mg/dl (6.7–8.9 mmol/l) and from 200 to 250 mg/dl (11.1–13.9 mmol/l), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies in the high-risk Pima Indian population that demonstrated a bimodal distribution of glucose levels following the OGTT (7,8) helped establish the 2-h value as the diagnostic value of choice, even though most populations had a unimodal distribution of glucose levels (9). Of note, a bimodal distribution was also seen in the fasting glucose samples in the Pimas and other high-risk populations (10,11). However, a discrete fasting plasma glucose (FPG) or 2-h plasma glucose (2HPG) level that separated the bimodal distributions in the Pimas was difficult to identify, with potential FPG and 2HPG cut points ranging from 120 to 160 mg/dl (6.7–8.9 mmol/l) and from 200 to 250 mg/dl (11.1–13.9 mmol/l), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The NDDG relied on distributions of glucose levels, rather than on the relationship of glucose levels with complications, to diagnose diabetes despite emerging evidence that the microvascular complications of diabetes were associated with a higher range of fasting and OGTT glucose values (11,1315). The diagnostic glucose values chosen were based on their association with decompensation to “overt” or symptomatic diabetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bimodality of plasma glucose, first described in this population [37], combined with the presence of retinopathy and nephropathy among those in the upper component of the distribution [38] led to standardized criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes adopted by the National Diabetes Data Group [39], the World Health Organization [16, 40], and the American Diabetes Association [41]. In the Diabetes Prevention Program [42], a clinical trial of diabetes prevention, Southwestern American Indians (many of whom were Pima), had the same risk of type 2 diabetes and the same reductions in risk from the interventions as members of other race/ethnic groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such discrepancies will reduce the efficacy of using FPG alone in diabetes screening. It is difficult to get physicians and patients to use the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) because of its drawbacks (12)(13)(14)(15)(16), especially for those patients already having an FPG Ͻ126. It is also impractical to conduct the OGTT for everyone in a diabetes screening.…”
Section: Diabetes Care 25:1365-1370 2002mentioning
confidence: 99%