2005
DOI: 10.1007/11499107_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faster Exact Solving of SAT Formulae with a Low Number of Occurrences per Variable

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the assumption that w 4 = 2w 3 (for Step 11, the worst branching vector in [18] is [4,8]). The branching factor for these three steps will decrease if the value of w 3 increases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the assumption that w 4 = 2w 3 (for Step 11, the worst branching vector in [18] is [4,8]). The branching factor for these three steps will decrease if the value of w 3 increases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All variables are 3-variables now. We apply the O * (1.1279 n )-time algorithm by Wahlström [18] to solve this special case, where n is the number of variables. For this case, we have that n = µ(F )/w 3 .…”
Section: Step 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [ 13 , 14 ], M. Wahlström presented a definition of ( )-variable to classify all variables in a CNF formula, and designed two algorithms for solving a CNF formula with at most d occurrences per variable. Here, an ( )-variable is a variable which occurs positively in a clauses and negatively in b clauses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calabro, Impagliazzo, and Paturi [2] proved that for both classes satisfiability can be checked in runtime O(γ n ) with γ < 2, and asymptotically related the bounds of k-SAT, SAT with m/n ≤ ∆, and SAT with at most d occurrences per variable to one another, essentially showing that the two latter bounds behave as the former one with k = Θ(log ∆) and k = Θ(log d), respectively. For small values of d, Wahlström [7,6] has given a stronger bound for formulas with at most d occurrences per variable of order O(1.1279 (d−2)n ). The main contribution of this paper is extending the boundaries of the classes of CNF formulas for which satisfiability can be checked faster than in runtime O(2 n ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main contribution of this paper is extending the boundaries of the classes of CNF formulas for which satisfiability can be checked faster than in runtime O(2 n ). In particular, we continue the line of research of [7], where the total number of occurrences (positive and negative) of each variable in a CNF formula F was restricted to at most d. Now, for each variable x of F we call the literal ∈ {x, ¬x} with less occurrences in F minor and its negation major. We then only restrict the number of minor literals in F to be at most d, that is, the total number of literal occurrences per variable in F remains unrestricted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%