2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2009.5414326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast vignetting correction and color matching for panoramic image stitching

Abstract: When images are stitched together to form a panorama there is often color mismatch between the source images due to vignetting and differences in exposure and white balance between images. In this paper a low complexity method is proposed to correct vignetting and differences in color between images, producing panoramas that look consistent across all source images. Unlike most previous methods which require complex non-linear optimization to solve for correction parameters, our method requires only linear reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gains are computed using an error function, which is the sum of gain normalized intensity errors for all overlapping pixels. Doutre and Nasiopoulos [24] use a second-order polynomial to correct each pixel in the target image using the exposure and white balance of I ref . The polynomial weights are computed by comparing the overlapping regions of images using standard linear least-squares regression.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gains are computed using an error function, which is the sum of gain normalized intensity errors for all overlapping pixels. Doutre and Nasiopoulos [24] use a second-order polynomial to correct each pixel in the target image using the exposure and white balance of I ref . The polynomial weights are computed by comparing the overlapping regions of images using standard linear least-squares regression.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pixel‐wise division, accomplished according to Eq. (2) (Souchier et al , 2004), is known as flat field (Jericevic et al , 1989; Model, 2001; Model & Burkhardt, 2001; Model et al , 2009) or retrospective correction (Young, 2001; Babaloukas et al , 2011): B is the noise relative to the acquisition system and is often neglected (Yu, 2004; Zwier et al , 2004; Doutre & Nasiopoulos, 2009) as in the present work. C is a multiplicative constant to bring the values of the flat field corrected image I FFC ( x ) in a given range.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B is the noise relative to the acquisition system and is often neglected (Yu, 2004;Zwier et al, 2004;Doutre & Nasiopoulos, 2009) as in the present work. C is a multiplicative constant to bring the values of the flat field corrected image I FFC (x) in a given range.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of vignetting on the image is undesirable in image processing and analysis, particularly in areas such as: image denoising [6], image segmentation [23], microscopic image analysis [17,18], sky image analysis [20], visual surveillance [10], motion analysis in video sequences [1] and panoramic images [9,16]. Therefore, from the viewpoint of image processing, it is important to reduce vignetting in image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%