2006
DOI: 10.1080/14697680600841108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast strong approximation Monte Carlo schemes for stochastic volatility models

Abstract: Numerical integration methods for stochastic volatility models in financial markets are discussed. We concentrate on two classes of stochastic volatility models where the volatility is either directly given by a mean-reverting CEV process or as a transformed Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. For the latter, we introduce a new model based on a simple hyperbolic transformation. Various numerical methods for integrating mean-reverting CEV processes are analysed and compared with respect to positivity preservation and e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another mistake is in the last term, where there is 1 2 instead of 1 4 compared to our equation. b n is v p n for Heston in the original article by Kahl and Jäckel [42]. This implies b.s/ D v.s/ 1=2 , which cancels out with v.s/ 1=2 and leaves in the notation of Haastrecht and Pelsser.…”
Section: Van Haastrecht and Pelsser Revisedmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Another mistake is in the last term, where there is 1 2 instead of 1 4 compared to our equation. b n is v p n for Heston in the original article by Kahl and Jäckel [42]. This implies b.s/ D v.s/ 1=2 , which cancels out with v.s/ 1=2 and leaves in the notation of Haastrecht and Pelsser.…”
Section: Van Haastrecht and Pelsser Revisedmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These two were causing difficulties because of the representation of their rather high values for finer discretizations. Also IJK scheme by Kahl and Jäckel [42], which is supposed to be a drop-in method for simple schemes, is tested with parameters obtained from the market and it appears not to be useful for pricing options using Monte Carlo simulations. We also did experiments and proposed a scheme compromising speed and accuracy based on the observed performances of the so far known schemes and we seem to have out-performed the other simple schemes when using the Monte Carlo simulations for pricing options.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations