2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10827-013-0478-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast state-space methods for inferring dendritic synaptic connectivity

Abstract: We present fast methods for filtering voltage measurements and performing optimal inference of the location and strength of synaptic connections in large dendritic trees. Given noisy, subsampled voltage observations we develop fast l 1 -penalized regression methods for Kalman state-space models of the neuron voltage dynamics. The value of the l 1 -penalty parameter is chosen using crossvalidation or, for low signal-to-noise ratio, a Mallows' C p -like criterion. Using low-rank approximations, we reduce the inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we discussed in the previous section, it relatively straightforward to infer neuronal correlations, given enough observed neural pairs. It is also relatively easy to infer a linear-Gaussian model of the network activity with missing observations [ 44 , 50 ], since we can analytically integrate out any unknown observations. However, as mentioned earlier (section 8) when inferring actual synaptic connectivity from real data, correlation and linear-based methods are inferior to a GLM-based approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we discussed in the previous section, it relatively straightforward to infer neuronal correlations, given enough observed neural pairs. It is also relatively easy to infer a linear-Gaussian model of the network activity with missing observations [ 44 , 50 ], since we can analytically integrate out any unknown observations. However, as mentioned earlier (section 8) when inferring actual synaptic connectivity from real data, correlation and linear-based methods are inferior to a GLM-based approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the finest scale, fast light-targeting methods have been developed in dendritic imaging and glutamate uncaging experiments (Branco et al, 2010; Lutz et al, 2008; Nikolenko et al, 2008; Svoboda et al, 1997; Yuste, 2010; Denk et al, 1996; reviewed in Grienberger et al, 2015). At the same time, mathematical and computational machinery necessary for system identification and control on dendrites using observation with optical voltage and calcium sensors has been developed (Pakman et al, 2014; Pnevmatikakis et al, 2012; Huggins and Paninski, 2012; Paninski, 2010), rendering optogenetic system identification and control of dendritic trees a promising area for future investigations. Recently, holographic light shaping and SLM point-scanning optogenetic manipulations have been explored using tools defined at the subcellular and cellular scale (Prakash et al, 2012; Packer et al, 2012; Vaziri and Emiliani, 2012; Anselmi et al, 2011; Yang et al, 2011; Papagiakoumou et al, 2008).…”
Section: Closed-loop and Activity-guided Optogenetics Across Brain Scmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the total volume of spike data that we collected from the network, the largest value of n for which this was possible is 10. Thus, these distributions are over 2 10 10-neuron binary spike state vectors.…”
Section: Characterizing Neural Activity Using Information Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%