2019
DOI: 10.1137/18m1180803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Solvers for Two-Dimensional Fractional Diffusion Equations Using Rank Structured Matrices

Abstract: We consider the discretization of time-space diffusion equations with fractional derivatives in space and either one-dimensional (1D) or 2D spatial domains. The use of an implicit Euler scheme in time and finite differences or finite elements in space leads to a sequence of dense large scale linear systems describing the behavior of the solution over a time interval. We prove that the coefficient matrices arising in the 1D context are rank structured and can be efficiently represented using hierarchical format… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in models involving fractional derivatives. For 2D problems on rectangular grids, discretizations by finite differences or finite elements lead to linear systems that can be recast as the solution of matrix equations with particularly structured coefficients [12,24]. However, a promising formulation which simplifies the design of boundary conditions relies on first discretizing the 2D Laplacian on the chosen domain, and then considers the action of the matrix function z −α (with the Laplacian as argument) on the right hand side.…”
Section: Motivating Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in models involving fractional derivatives. For 2D problems on rectangular grids, discretizations by finite differences or finite elements lead to linear systems that can be recast as the solution of matrix equations with particularly structured coefficients [12,24]. However, a promising formulation which simplifies the design of boundary conditions relies on first discretizing the 2D Laplacian on the chosen domain, and then considers the action of the matrix function z −α (with the Laplacian as argument) on the right hand side.…”
Section: Motivating Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows to rephrase the integrals of ( 24) in the more convenient form The above integral is well-defined even if we let → 0, we can can take the limit in (24) which yields exactly the value 1 2 for the first term, and we have reduced the problem to estimate f (t) = 1 2 + (−1) π ∞ 0 sin(st+θ(s)) s ds. To bound the integral, we split the integration domain in three parts:…”
Section: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following lemmas we prove that {M n } n ∼ λ 0 and that { T n } n ∼ λ (g, [−π, π]) with g as in (1.1). The proof of Lemma 3.1 is based on the idea in Proposition 3.10 in [10].…”
Section: Spectral Distribution Of (Preconditioned) Flipped Toeplitz Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, suitable choices of the smoothing functions may lead to structured transition matrices (as in the case of fractional derivatives e.g. [44]) and exploring this line of research may lead to efficient methods for using nonlocal PageRank on large scale problems, an issue that will be object of future investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%