2019
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/14/11/p11028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast simulation of muons produced at the SHiP experiment using Generative Adversarial Networks

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the authors focus on pp → 2 jet processes, and implement an Artificial Neural Network point selection (NNPS) scheme for selecting training data based on the points the network struggles to learn the most. In addition, there has been much work on the use of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) [14], and other generative models, for event generation [15][16][17][18][19][20][21], while there has been little work addressing the issue of explicit matrix element approximation [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the authors focus on pp → 2 jet processes, and implement an Artificial Neural Network point selection (NNPS) scheme for selecting training data based on the points the network struggles to learn the most. In addition, there has been much work on the use of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) [14], and other generative models, for event generation [15][16][17][18][19][20][21], while there has been little work addressing the issue of explicit matrix element approximation [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of GANs within particle physics are constantly appearing. GANs have been applied in both event generation [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and detector modelling [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. In this section the inference and training speeds of some of these particle physics based GANs are assessed on the IPU hardware and compared to results on the GPU and CPU described in Table 1.…”
Section: Event Generation and Tracking Corrections Using Gansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparing a GAN to the full simulation care needs to be taken to assign a systematic uncertainty related to the residual mismodelling. The GAN event generation is particularly helpful when the systematic uncertainty due to its mismodelling is smaller than other errors associated with other parts of the analysis procedure [38]. A limitation of the GAN-based event-generation stems from the fact that the range of the feature space that the GAN can accurately model is defined by that of the full-simulation training sample.…”
Section: Event Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work [16] demonstrates how optimal representation variables, describing different states of physical systems, could be learned by neural nets. Generative Adversarial Nets, a generative Deep Learning models have started to be successfully applied for the event simulations [17,18]. Review of possibilities of application of ML and DL methods to high energy physics can be found elsewhere [19][20][21].…”
Section: Jhep07(2020)133mentioning
confidence: 99%