2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24591-9_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Scalar Multiplication Method Using Change-of-Basis Matrix to Prevent Power Analysis Attacks on Koblitz Curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not a problem if a normal basis is used to represent the field, but may induce a performance penalty with a polynomial basis. A similar problem was faced by the authors of [20], and they solved it adapting an idea from [21]. The idea consists in keeping a copy R of the point P in normal basis representation.…”
Section: Return (X)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is not a problem if a normal basis is used to represent the field, but may induce a performance penalty with a polynomial basis. A similar problem was faced by the authors of [20], and they solved it adapting an idea from [21]. The idea consists in keeping a copy R of the point P in normal basis representation.…”
Section: Return (X)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usual windowed methods with precomputations have, of course, similar time complexity but use storage for 2 w−2 −1 points [23,24] and thus O(n2 w ) = O(n 2 / log n) bits of memory. Algorithms 3 and 4 need O(n 2 ) bits of field-dependent (but not point-dependent) data for base conversion (as in [21,20]) that can be stored statically (such as in ROM).…”
Section: A Performance Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the number of Frobenius operations can increase exponentially with u. To ensure that this does not become a performance problem if polynomial bases are used, a technique from [20] is adopted to convert between normal and polynomial bases as required to quickly compute iterated Frobenius operations.…”
Section: Further Developments In τ -Adic Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One solution is provided, as already mentioned, by a technique introduced by Park et al in [20] and used by Okeya et al in [19]. Instead of applying a variable power of the Frobenius to a changing point as done in Steps 5 to 9 if Algorithm 3, we apply the Frobenius to the point P and accumulate directly.…”
Section: On the Use Of Normal Vs Polynomial Basesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not a problem if a normal basis is used to represent the field, but may induce a performance penalty with a polynomial basis. A similar problem was faced by Okeya, Takagi and Vuillaume in [16], and they solved it adapting an idea by Park, Sim and Lee [17]. The technique consists in keeping a copy R of the point P in normal basis representation.…”
Section: Return (X)mentioning
confidence: 96%