Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference 2004
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2004.1383697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast reduced order modeling technique for large scale LTV systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the number of POD, DEIM and DMD are always the same in Figure 5 Since the POD-DMD is faster than other method it is natural to look at the performance with different number of basis functions. Figure 5.4 shows the error for a fixed number of basis functions = {5, 10, 15} and k ∈ [1,40]. As we can see the POD-DMD performs better than POD-DEIM when = 5, 10.…”
Section: Test 3: Semi-linear Parabolic Equationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We note that the number of POD, DEIM and DMD are always the same in Figure 5 Since the POD-DMD is faster than other method it is natural to look at the performance with different number of basis functions. Figure 5.4 shows the error for a fixed number of basis functions = {5, 10, 15} and k ∈ [1,40]. As we can see the POD-DMD performs better than POD-DEIM when = 5, 10.…”
Section: Test 3: Semi-linear Parabolic Equationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These grid point selection procedures were later improved by incorporating a greedy algorithm from [95]. The applications of the MPE method are primarily in the context of a linear time varying system arising from FV discretization of a nonlinear computational fluid dynamic model for a glass melting furnace [6,5,8,7]. It has also been used in modeling heat transfer in electrical circuits [89] and in subsurface flow simulation [17].…”
Section: Techniques For Nonlinearitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure can be viewed as performing the Galerkin projection onto the truncated POD basis via a specially constructed inner product as defined in [9] that evaluates only at selected grid points instead of computing the usual L 2 inner product. Two heuristic methods for selecting these spatial grid points are introduced in the thesis [6] (also in subsequent publications, e.g [5,8,7]) by aiming to minimize aliasing effects in using only partial spatial points. This was shown to be equivalent to a criterion for preserving the orthogonality of the restricted POD basis vectors, which is further translated into a criterion for controlling condition number growth.…”
Section: Techniques For Nonlinearitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of hyper-reduction methods are: Gappy-POD [91], Missing Point Estimation (MPE) [92], Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method (DEIM) [93], Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) [94] or numerical linearization [95]; for a comparison see [96]. These methods construct (linear) reduced representations of the nonlinearity in a data-driven manner.…”
Section: On Hyper-reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%