2016
DOI: 10.1142/s0217732316300135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast radio bursts — A brief review: Some questions, fewer answers

Abstract: Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are millisecond bursts of radio radiation at frequencies of about 1 GHz, recently discovered in pulsar surveys. They have not yet been definitively identified with any other astronomical object or phenomenon. The bursts are strongly dispersed, indicating passage through a high column density of low density plasma. The most economical interpretation is that this is the interglactic medium, indicating that FRB are at "cosmological" distances with redshifts in the range 0.3-1.3. Their inf… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
126
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(11) and (12), we can then integrate the resulting ∆ρ E ≡ ρ l=1 E − ρ l=0 E over the bubble region to yield a total released energy of ≈ 4 × 10 39 B 2 11 ergs. This result appears to be in good agreement with the implied energy of 10 38 − 10 40 ergs for the FRBs (Katz (2016a)), noting that these observation-implied numbers may be slight overestimates, however, depending on which fraction of the DMs is appropriated into the intergalactic medium (see Sect. 7 below).…”
Section: Bubble-free Magnetospheresupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(11) and (12), we can then integrate the resulting ∆ρ E ≡ ρ l=1 E − ρ l=0 E over the bubble region to yield a total released energy of ≈ 4 × 10 39 B 2 11 ergs. This result appears to be in good agreement with the implied energy of 10 38 − 10 40 ergs for the FRBs (Katz (2016a)), noting that these observation-implied numbers may be slight overestimates, however, depending on which fraction of the DMs is appropriated into the intergalactic medium (see Sect. 7 below).…”
Section: Bubble-free Magnetospheresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The enormous distance scales that come with this assumption imply that a large amount of energy needs to be available, 10 38 −10 40 ergs, to be more precise (Katz (2016a), assuming isotropic emission). In addition, the short pulse duration requires a compact source region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The catastrophic models (e.g., Totani 2013; Kashiyama et al 2013;Falcke & Rezzolla 2014;Zhang 2014Zhang , 2016aWang et al 2016) cannot interpret the repeating FRB 121102. The previously favored super-giant-pulse model (in analogy to nanoshots from the Crab pulsar; Cordes & Wasserman 2016;Connor et al 2016) invokes nearby galaxy not at the cosmological distances and therefore are challenged by the fact that the repeater is located in a host galaxy at redshift z=0.193 (Tendulkar et al 2017; but see Katz 2016aKatz , 2016b. The magnetar giant flare model (Popov & Postnov 2010;Kulkarni et al 2014;Katz 2016c) is in apparent conflict with the non-detection of bright radio pulse from the SGR 1806-20 giant flare (Tendulkar et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catastrophic event models are able to explain non-repeating burst , including the merger of compact objects (Kashiyama et al 2013;Wang et al 2016), super massive neutron stars collapsing to black holes (Falcke & Rezzolla 2014;Zhang 2014), and so on. The repeating burst is more likely to originate from young remnants of stellar collapses, neutron stars or black holes (Katz 2016a), e.g. soft gamma repeaters (Pen & Connor 2015;Katz 2016c), giant pulse from young pulsars (Keane et al 2012;Katz 2016b), and the interaction of pulsars with planets (Mottez & Zarka 2014), asteroids or comets (Geng & Huang 2015;Dai et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%