2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevx.4.031006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Prediction and Evaluation of Gravitational Waveforms Using Surrogate Models

Abstract: We propose a solution to the problem of quickly and accurately predicting gravitational waveforms within any given physical model. The method is relevant for both real-time applications and more traditional scenarios where the generation of waveforms using standard methods can be prohibitively expensive. Our approach is based on three offline steps resulting in an accurate reduced order model in both parameter and physical dimensions that can be used as a surrogate for the true or fiducial waveform family. Fir… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
292
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(243 reference statements)
0
292
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[35] using NR waveforms from Ref. [36], enhanced with reduced-order modeling [37] to speed up waveform generation [38,39] (henceforth, EOBNR), and the single effective spin, precessing waveform model of Refs. [40][41][42] (henceforth, IMRPHENOM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35] using NR waveforms from Ref. [36], enhanced with reduced-order modeling [37] to speed up waveform generation [38,39] (henceforth, EOBNR), and the single effective spin, precessing waveform model of Refs. [40][41][42] (henceforth, IMRPHENOM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, they will not be consistent with the usual postNewtonian waveforms; using the raw waveforms to construct hybrids with PN waveforms would result in mismatches between the modes. Using raw waveforms to calibrate effective-onebody waveforms [49][50][51], surrogate models [54,55], or other phenomenological waveform models [52,53] would degrade the quality of the numerous fits inherent to the calibration process, by subjecting them to effectively random noise in the input. A broader and deeper survey of the effects of these transformations on waveforms in the SXS catalog will be the subject of an upcoming paper [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the numerical waveform has spurious features, the waveforms will appear to align poorly, so the calibration will be less than optimal and result in inaccurate waveforms. Other phenomenological waveform models [52,53] and surrogate models [54,55] would experience the same biases, trying to fit simple formulas to waveforms with effectively random gauge effects. Similarly, when constructing hybrid waveform models [48], the hybrids will be imperfect or even discontinuous in the region where one switches from analytical to numerical data.…”
Section: Effects On Data Analysis For Gravitational-wave Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present EOB waveforms for spinning BH binaries are computationally expensive to generate (although far faster than doing NR simulations) and hence not suitable for use in Markov Chain Monte Carlo-based parameter estimation methods. Quite importantly, accelerated waveform generation techniques that use reduced-order algorithms or singular-value decomposition techniques have been proposed to address such problems [411][412][413][414][415].…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%