2018 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icuas.2018.8453331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Mutual Relative Localization of UAVs using Ultraviolet LED Markers

Abstract: This paper proposes a new methodology for outdoor mutual relative localization of UAVs equipped with active ultraviolet markers and a suitable camera with specialized bandpass filters. Mutual relative localization is a crucial tool for formation preservation, swarming and cooperative task completion in scenarios in which UAVs share working space in small relative distances. In most current systems of compact UAV swarms the localization of particular UAVs is based on the data obtained from motion capture system… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our solution extends our previous research on a novel, vision-based mutual localization in the Ultra-Violet (UV) spectrum [17] . Motivated by the low amount of near-UV radiation in sunlight and most artificial sources, compared to the visible spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our solution extends our previous research on a novel, vision-based mutual localization in the Ultra-Violet (UV) spectrum [17] . Motivated by the low amount of near-UV radiation in sunlight and most artificial sources, compared to the visible spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For the sake of brevity, only key properties for our approach are presented, more details are presented in [17].…”
Section: Theoretical Background a Uv Spectrum: Properties And Momentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Decentralized information filter 3 m * 2 m Decimeter level [12] Optical flow sensor, IMU EKF 6 m * 6 m 0.3 m in mean [13] Ultraviolet LED makers Mutual relative localization 10 m distance Meter level [14] 3D lidar, UWB, IMU EKF Simulation Decimeter level [15] 2D lidar CNN 4 m * 4 m Decimeter level [16] 2D lidar, IMU SLAM 8 m * 8 m 1.0 m for 26 s, 0.5 m for 10 s [17] 2D lidar, IMU Tightly coupled SLAM 60 m corridor Meter level [18] 1D laser, IMU, barometer EKF 5 m * 9 m 0.1 m height accuracy in mean [19] Radar Radar odometry 80 m * 10 m 3.3 m in mean [20] Radar, UWB, IMU EKF 40 m * 40 m 0.8 m in RMS [21] UWB Multilateration 20 m * 30 m, 4 AP 2.0 m in mean [22] UWB TDoA 4 m * 2 m, 4 AP 0.1 m in 75 % [23] UWB, IMU Tightly coupled EKF 19 m * 13 m 0.15 m in mean [24] UWB, monocular camera SLAM 8 m * 8 m 0.23 m in 75 % [25] UWB, RGB-D camera Monte Carlo localization 15 m * 15 m 0.2 m in RMS [26] Ultrasonic Multilateration 4 m * 3 m, 6 AP 0.16 m in RMS [27] Ultrasonic CNN 10 m * 4 m Decimeter level [28] Ultrasonic, time-of-flight camera Multilateration 0.7 m * 0.7 m, 5 AP 0.17 m in median [29] WiFi Fingerprinting 36 m * 17 m, 10 APs 1.7 m in mean [30] WiFi A quasi-taut tether Angle and range-based 2.5 m * 2.5 m 0.37 m in mean * SLAM-simultaneous localization and mapping; 1D/2D/3D-one/two/three-dimensional; EKF-extended Kalman filter; PF-particle filter; CNN-convolution neural network; RGB-D-red-green-blue-depth; RMS-root mean squares; TDoA-time-difference-of-arrival; RFID-radio frequency identification; LED-light-emitting diode; RSS-received signal strength; AP-access point; WiFi-wireless fidelity; BLE-Bluetooth low energy; N/A-not provided.…”
Section: Methods Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the aforementioned studies are all developed for indoor use and hence, it is not applicable to outdoor applications. A similar idea for outdoor target localization is introduced in [18], where ultraviolet LED markers are used instead of IR LEDs. In this research, it is claimed that the ultraviolet light in the normal sunlight is significantly less intense and thus, the natural environments are normally too dim to prevent the detection from the camera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%