2016
DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Moment-Based Estimation for Hierarchical Models

Abstract: Hierarchical models allow for heterogeneous behaviours in a population while simultaneously borrowing estimation strength across all subpopulations. Unfortunately, existing likelihood-based methods for fitting hierarchical models have high computational demands, and these demands have limited their adoption in large-scale prediction and inference problems. The paper proposes a moment-based procedure for estimating the parameters of a hierarchical model which has its roots in a method originally introduced by C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DEM was implemented in R (R Core Team 2016) using the Rmpi package (Yu 2002) and van Dyk's ECME algorithm. Our real data analysis based on the examples considered in Perry (2017) showed that DEM with γ = 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 matches the accuracy of van Dyk's ECME in parameter estimation while being significantly faster for all three values of γ; see Section 5. The major advantage of DEM was its generality in that it scaled the ECME algorithm to massive data settings using its non-distributed implementation and MPI.…”
Section: Motivating Example: Movielens Ratings Datamentioning
confidence: 74%
“…DEM was implemented in R (R Core Team 2016) using the Rmpi package (Yu 2002) and van Dyk's ECME algorithm. Our real data analysis based on the examples considered in Perry (2017) showed that DEM with γ = 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 matches the accuracy of van Dyk's ECME in parameter estimation while being significantly faster for all three values of γ; see Section 5. The major advantage of DEM was its generality in that it scaled the ECME algorithm to massive data settings using its non-distributed implementation and MPI.…”
Section: Motivating Example: Movielens Ratings Datamentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Using the empirical marker distribution, the model generates the log-odds that the expression of a given marker is predictive of the sample type (for example, drug-treated vs. placebo-treated) with the 95% confidence intervals. For paired comparisons, we computed p-values using the asymptotic theory implemented in R package mbest (Perry 2017). For unpaired comparisons, we computed p-values by inverting the percentile bootstrap confidence intervals and assuming two-sided intervals with equal tails (Efron and Tibshirani 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the semi-weighted scheme for choosing W ij as described by (Perry, 2017). Now, the moment equations have consistent dimension across all nodes: for every node ij ∈ N l , equation (10) has dimension p l−1 × 1, and (11) has dimension q l × q l .…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let Perry's (2017) results imply that, subject to assumptions on the sample size, conditional on b i , the quantity Ω…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%