2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2018.8594156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Kinodynamic Bipedal Locomotion Planning with Moving Obstacles

Abstract: In this paper, we present a sampling-based kinodynamic planning framework for a bipedal robot in complex environments. Unlike other footstep planning algorithms which typically plan footstep locations and the biped dynamics in separate steps, we handle both simultaneously. Three primary advantages of this approach are (1) the ability to differentiate alternate routes while selecting footstep locations based on the temporal duration of the route as determined by the Linear Inverted Pendulum Model (LIPM) dynamic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We characterize different dynamic models used for locomotion planning purposes. Dynamic locomotion has been studied using point mass models (PM) with predefined footholds and step timings (Koolen et al, 2012;Englsberger et al, 2015;Ahn et al, 2018) and PM models' variations to account for swing foot angular momentum (Faraji et al, 2019;Seyde et al, 2018;Ahn et al, 2020). These approaches are computationally efficient but require the contact schedule and the swing foot trajectories to be predefined by experts.…”
Section: Dynamic Locomotion Planning For Legged Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We characterize different dynamic models used for locomotion planning purposes. Dynamic locomotion has been studied using point mass models (PM) with predefined footholds and step timings (Koolen et al, 2012;Englsberger et al, 2015;Ahn et al, 2018) and PM models' variations to account for swing foot angular momentum (Faraji et al, 2019;Seyde et al, 2018;Ahn et al, 2020). These approaches are computationally efficient but require the contact schedule and the swing foot trajectories to be predefined by experts.…”
Section: Dynamic Locomotion Planning For Legged Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 5) is a simple proportional-derivative controller and T x , T y , κ x and κ y are the gain parameters to keep the CoM converging to the desired position. A more detailed derivation of the LIPM is described in [15].…”
Section: Tvr Plannermentioning
confidence: 99%